> >
> > Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
> >
> > LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.
>
> Is that the MMX version of LAME?
>
> Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Mark,
I don't know if it is a MMX version - how
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, engdev wrote:
> > You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
> > times faster Bo)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wim Speekenbrink
>
> Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
>
> LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than X
> You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
> times faster Bo)
>
> Regards,
> Wim Speekenbrink
Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.
I thought the difference was greater, but I had
You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
times faster Bo)
Regards,
Wim Speekenbrink
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3
>
> Well, I just compared speed: Xing is about 4 times faster than Lame in VBR
> mode.
>
> Regards,
> Wim Speekenbrink
>
>
Compare to "lame --abr 128".
I bet Xing's VBR mode is much closer to LAME's ABR than LAME's VBR.
Mark
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> The Xing MP3 encoder is exceptionally fast. Do they cut corners to get
such high
> performance? Is their code written in assember?
>
> What (if any) chance of getting similar speed out of LAME?
>
> The Xing encoder is quite limited with regard to input sampling
frequencies and
> output bitrates.
Well, I just compared speed: Xing is about 4 times faster than Lame in VBR
mode.
Regards,
Wim Speekenbrink
- Original Message -
From: "Zia Mazhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3
> The Xing MP3 encoder is exceptionally fast. Do they cut corners to get such high
> performance? Is their code written in assember?
Who knows how did they program it... But they did sacrifice some quality.
>
>
> What (if any) chance of getting similar speed out of LAME?
LAME is pretty fast too
The Xing MP3 encoder is exceptionally fast. Do they cut corners to get such high
performance? Is their code written in assember?
What (if any) chance of getting similar speed out of LAME?
The Xing encoder is quite limited with regard to input sampling frequencies and
output bitrates. Has anyone
