- Original Message -
From: Keeshond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Off Topic Advice Please
8<---snip-
> MMJB5 uses 'simplified' version of FIIS, it also sounds
> Zia Mazhar wrote:
>
> Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the
codec of
> Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will
give you
> better quality and I think it is easier to use.
MMJB5 uses 'simplified' version of FIIS, it also sounds nice
> Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the
codec of
> Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will
give you
> better quality and I think it is easier to use.
Am I the only one to really dislike that kind of "skinned" user
interfaces (thoug
Zia Mazhar wrote:
> Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the codec of
> Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will give you
> better quality and I think it is easier to use.
Am I the only one to really dislike that kind of "skinned" user
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:36:03 -0400
>
> So, do we all believe that fraunhofer encoders
> still edge out lame at low bitrate cbr?
>
Recently, I heard from a company that works with lots of radio
stations in the US was evaluting several codecs at 128kbs CBR. They
So, do we all believe that fraunhofer encoders
still edge out lame at low bitrate cbr?
Begin Original Message
From: "Mathew Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 16:36:35 +0100
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Off Topic Advice
> From: "Mark Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> isn't LAME higher quality at a faster speeds? The new FhG codec at high
> speed isn't very good, I thought, or is there proof otherwise?
IMO FhG's "fast" encoder is the best around for lower bitrates - 160kbit/s
and below. But the heuristic they're
rom: "Mark Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2000 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Off Topic Advice Please
>
> Musicmatch now comes with free, unrestricted MP3 encoding using
> the FhG codec. I think this is going to mak
Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the codec of
Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will give you
better quality and I think it is easier to use.
- Zia
> Musicmatch now comes with free, unrestricted MP3 encoding using
> the FhG codec
>
> Which encoding engines are being used in MusicMatch and Realaudio Jukebox?
> I seem to remember some discussion here about the Fraunhoffer encoder in
> MusicMatch being crippled (not bitrate limited but missing some "features").
> Which program has the better encoder? Can either one use LAME
Which encoding engines are being used in MusicMatch and Realaudio Jukebox?
I seem to remember some discussion here about the Fraunhoffer encoder in
MusicMatch being crippled (not bitrate limited but missing some "features").
Which program has the better encoder? Can either one use LAME as an
exter
11 matches
Mail list logo
