On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:11:57AM -0600, Mark Taylor wrote:
>
> 4. LAME should be converted to C++ or Java. C just is not up to
> the task of distinguishing between 30 different types of integers.
>
* Good C programs should use the following identifier for variable names:
new, delete, oper
>
> 2. I dont think declaring the sample rate as 'long double' is enough. We
> need to add a portable, object oriented arbritrary precision floating
> point library to LAME. The sample rate should be a default of
> 128 digits, but the user can increase this with suitable
> options.
>
Mathemati
::
:: 3. Creating a dozen or so odd types, all synonymous with 'int'
:: is a great idea. But I saw a few 'int's left. I think
:: we need to replace these with more new types.
::
When you were a physicist, you were a cgs advocate and a SI enemy, right?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Frank
>This is a good idea. Some comments (Frank: not all of these are serious:-)
I am serious :)
> 5. All developers should be required to take 200 hours of UML training
> before working on any more code.
6. Learn more about CVS, especially about making your own branch.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // may
> What about the proposal to design and discuss a well designed lame API now
> without implementation? AFAICS this takes at least 3 months, if you want to
> have a durable and neat API, Mark don't want to change the API until summer
> 2001. May be should use this time to design all the structur
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:10:19PM +0200, Robert Hegemann wrote:
>
> So for backward compatibility we should make a wrapper library
> with the old interface (as much as possible) and mark this as
> old and outdated, to give clients the possibility for smooth
> migration t
Hi Robert,
This just seems like a lot of work for no real gain since all 4
libraries are samll and closely related. To build LAME we would need
a ./configure setup which builds 4 different libraries. so I guess I
just dont see any reason to seperate them.
Special applications, like embeded en
Mark Taylor schrieb am Son, 01 Okt 2000:
> >
> > >I think the mp3 encoding library should do what it is
> > >supposed to do, encode pcm samples into mp3 frames.
> >
> > BTW, Robert and everyone, how should we treat with mpglib and lame_mp3_XX
> > routines in frontend/get_audio.c and amiga_mpega.
>
> >I think the mp3 encoding library should do what it is
> >supposed to do, encode pcm samples into mp3 frames.
>
> BTW, Robert and everyone, how should we treat with mpglib and lame_mp3_XX
> routines in frontend/get_audio.c and amiga_mpega.c ?
>
> I think these routine should be another li
>I think the mp3 encoding library should do what it is
>supposed to do, encode pcm samples into mp3 frames.
BTW, Robert and everyone, how should we treat with mpglib and lame_mp3_XX
routines in frontend/get_audio.c and amiga_mpega.c ?
I think these routine should be another library, and the libr
10 matches
Mail list logo
