Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? [re-send]

2000-08-06 Thread Mark Taylor
> What about an option "adjust-level-for-psycho-model", which increases the > level for the threshold computation, so low level music is coded with more > bits. To my mind low level pieces of music with a turned up volume control > are coded with too less bits. lame is coding for a full scale SPL

Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ?

2000-08-02 Thread ampex69
What exactly does the -q switch do anyways? Begin Original Message From: Stephan Ebertshäuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 12:23:01 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Hi all! > > > Wednesday, August 02, 2000,

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ?

2000-08-02 Thread Stephan Ebertshäuser
Hi all! > > > Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 1:06:26 AM, you wrote: > > >> In 3.86a it seems, that this feature is always switched on. > >> I'am using: > >> -mj --vbr-old -V1 -b128 -F > >> Adding -h has no influence. > >> With the older 3.85, > >> -mj -V1 -b128 -F > >> gives better results as > >

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ?

2000-08-01 Thread Robert Hegemann
Jack Davis schrieb am Don, 01 Jan 1970: > Robert Hegemann wrote: > >Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 00:06:16 +0200 > >Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding glitches with -mj > >.. > >By the way, Takehiro's scalefac_scale feature (aka -q1 feature) > >is now on by default (with -h). > > In 3.86a it seems, th

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ?

2000-08-01 Thread Stephan Ebertshäuser
Jack Davis schrieb: > Robert Hegemann wrote: > >Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 00:06:16 +0200 > >Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding glitches with -mj > >.. > >By the way, Takehiro's scalefac_scale feature (aka -q1 feature) > >is now on by default (with -h). > > In 3.86a it seems, that this feature is