Re: Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different results + some 3.87 comments

2000-09-28 Thread Robert Hegemann
Mark Powell schrieb am Don, 28 Sep 2000: > He also thinks -q1 could be unsafe. Is that unsafe just in v3.87 or has it > always been so, Robert? Well, if we considered it always safe, we had made it default. Combined with some -V0 or -V1 it seems to be OK. If you compare "-

Re: Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different results + some 3.87 comments

2000-09-28 Thread Robert Hegemann
Mark Powell schrieb am Don, 28 Sep 2000: > I'm guessing that it's this that makes you happy with the velvet sound? > > RH_AMP stuff is what was previously known as RH_NOISE_CALC > RH_VALIDATE_MS avoids to switch from LR to MS when > the perceptual entropy indicates a need

Re: Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different results+ some 3.87 comments

2000-09-28 Thread Mark Powell
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Roel VdB wrote: > Hello Dmitry, > > Thursday, September 28, 2000, 1:34:50 PM, you wrote: > > D> nommx version was compiled with ic 4.5 (with project files) > D> mmx version was compiled with makefile.msvc (ic4.5) > D> may be here is the problem > > since the nommx ic versi

Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different results + some 3.87 comments

2000-09-28 Thread Roel VdB
Hello Dmitry, Thursday, September 28, 2000, 1:34:50 PM, you wrote: D> nommx version was compiled with ic 4.5 (with project files) D> mmx version was compiled with makefile.msvc (ic4.5) D> may be here is the problem since the nommx ic version seems to output abberant data, could you please try a