Re: [MP3 ENCODER] what is with the "new" version

2002-12-03 Thread Takehiro Tominaga
> "A" == Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There is not yet any support of any SSE or SSE2 optimizations >> into Lame yet. Only MMX and 3DNow are there. This is likely >> to be something that is compiled by mixing some files from Gogo >> and fron Lame. A

[MP3 ENCODER] Re: Mono TO Stereo re-code? (Was: Batch resampling (Was: a NewbieQuestion, possibly OT))

2002-12-03 Thread Per Bolmstedt
At 21:11 2002-11-28 -0500, john buchannan wrote: > Is there any way (even in the comand line) to resample > a mono mp3 to a stereo? Not that I know, but you can go through for example SoX (.soundforge.net) using pipes for that, using something like this: lame --decode mono.mp3 - | sox - -c 2 -

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] what is with the "new" version

2002-12-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:38:34 +0100 "Gabriel Bouvigne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Lame 3.93.1 Stable Released! > >You can find here latest complete Win32 exe, dll and ACM versions with > Intel MMX, SSE & SSE2, and AMD >3DNow! optimizations (by Intel Compiler 7 > and Nasm)" > > There is not yet a

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: legality

2002-12-03 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne
> > Winamp and Sonique are both software decodeers that have to > > pay no royalty > > I don't think that's correct. According to this page > http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty, there is a 75c/unit royalty charge > for PC software decoders. AOL & Sonic probably went for the $50,000 one > time pa