On 1/30/09, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> 2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Bill Hart
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
> >>>
> >>> On 1/29/09, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Case,
>
> thank you, that would be very helpful.
>
> I have
2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
>>>
>>> On 1/29/09, Bill Hart wrote:
Case,
thank you, that would be very helpful.
I have just finished building and testing MPIR on cygwin. Apart fro
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> 2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
>>
>> On 1/29/09, Bill Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> Case,
>>>
>>> thank you, that would be very helpful.
>>>
>>> I have just finished building and testing MPIR on cygwin. Apart from a
>>> warning about undefined symbols in t
>
> I was able to work around the demos issue by using "touch *.c *.h" in
> the demos/calc directory. If you do that before you create the
> tarball, it should work.
>
Excellent! I had wondered about that. I will make a script for
generating tarballs for mpir. It will touch these files, remove .s
2009/1/30 Case Vanhorsen :
>
> On 1/29/09, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Case,
>>
>> thank you, that would be very helpful.
>>
>> I have just finished building and testing MPIR on cygwin. Apart from a
>> warning about undefined symbols in the library (it didn't specify what
>> they were), it built and p
It is possible that the pentium code is broken. But I don't know
anyone who has one to try it out. I'm not overly worried as I'm doubt
our door is going to be knocked down by people trying to run MPIR on
old pentiums.
Obviously we'd like to hear from anyone who needs it and it doesn't
work for th
