[mpir-devel] Re: x86_64 cpuid

2009-03-18 Thread Jason Moxham
A summary of the new proposed x86_64 directorys base directory when all we know is that it is 64bit x86 and for any code that is common to all x86_64 chips x86_64 For the AMD chips AKA Opteron=K8 Phenom=k10 x86_64/k8 x86_64/k8/k10 For the Intel core2 chips AKA merom=core2-65nm dunnington=pen

[mpir-devel] Re: x86_64 cpuid

2009-03-18 Thread Bill Hart
> By the time we are in config.guess , we allready know that we are either 32 or > 64 > Pff, gosh I'm dumb sometimes. Of course we do. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to t

[mpir-devel] Re: x86_64 cpuid

2009-03-18 Thread Jason Moxham
On Thursday 19 March 2009 01:44:19 Bill Hart wrote: > 2009/3/19 Jason Moxham : > > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:40:30 Bill Hart wrote: > >> Jason, > >> > >> I had a look over this and it looks brilliant. This really deals with > >> a number of tickets, which is great! > >> > >> Some comments: > >>

[mpir-devel] Re: x86_64 cpuid

2009-03-18 Thread Bill Hart
2009/3/19 Jason Moxham : > > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:40:30 Bill Hart wrote: >> Jason, >> >> I had a look over this and it looks brilliant. This really deals with >> a number of tickets, which is great! >> >> Some comments: >> >> The name athlon seems inconsistent with k5, k6, k62, k63, k8, k10

[mpir-devel] Re: x86_64 cpuid

2009-03-18 Thread Jason Moxham
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:40:30 Bill Hart wrote: > Jason, > > I had a look over this and it looks brilliant. This really deals with > a number of tickets, which is great! > > Some comments: > > The name athlon seems inconsistent with k5, k6, k62, k63, k8, k10. It > seems to me that Athlon and k7

[mpir-devel] Re: mpirbench-0.2 uploaded

2009-03-18 Thread Bill Hart
Gonzalo, Mariah, the version Gonzalo posted, is now in the svn repo in a branch mpirbench-0.1. It shouldn't suffer from the issues Mariah mentioned and should have the changes Gonzalo made. It also includes Brian's python script (the linux one won't work on Windows). Again, thanks for your effor

[mpir-devel] Re: mpirbench-0.2 uploaded

2009-03-18 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
This is set up to test an already installed mpir library, afaict. I posted a different modification a few days ago which allows to test a non-installed mpir library (i.e. just compiled). It also (automatically) works with older versions of mpir which use "gmp" for the library name (e.g. 0.9) and m

[mpir-devel] mpirbench-0.2 uploaded

2009-03-18 Thread Mariah Lenox
I have uploaded mpirbench-0.2. This is a minor modification of Bill Hart's mpirbench-0.1 - taking out references to GMP and adding a makefile configuration. Mariah --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "m

[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-1.0 yasm problems

2009-03-18 Thread Mariah
On Mar 18, 10:40 am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:20:52AM -0400, Mariah Lenox wrote: > > > mpir-1.0 is failing to configure on two archectures > > that I have tried. Both failures seem to be related to > > yasm. > > > On a pentium4-pc-linux-gnu: > > > config.status

[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-1.0 yasm problems

2009-03-18 Thread Willem Jan Palenstijn
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:20:52AM -0400, Mariah Lenox wrote: > > mpir-1.0 is failing to configure on two archectures > that I have tried. Both failures seem to be related to > yasm. > > On a pentium4-pc-linux-gnu: > > config.status: linking ../mpir-1.0/yasm_mac.inc.nofat to yasm_mac.inc > ===

[mpir-devel] mpir-1.0 yasm problems

2009-03-18 Thread Mariah Lenox
mpir-1.0 is failing to configure on two archectures that I have tried. Both failures seem to be related to yasm. On a pentium4-pc-linux-gnu: config.status: linking ../mpir-1.0/yasm_mac.inc.nofat to yasm_mac.inc === configuring in yasm (/usr/local/mpir-1.0/src/obj-x86-Linux-gcc-4.3.3/yasm) confi