[mpir-devel] Re: Status on parallel algorithms and benchmark

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
Parallel code will require a major rewrite of MPIR. So far we've concentrated on build support for Sun, Apple and MSVC and improving single core assembly code for major CPU's. We still have some work to achieve our goals there (for example we don't support 32 bit OSX on x86, and we have heaps of a

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.1.0 testing (volunteers sought)

2009-04-14 Thread Jason Moxham
tested with the converted asm code on cuda1, sage,box1,2,3 (k10,penryn,i7,k8,k7) with options (various random choices) of enable-assert , enable-fat, enable-alloca=debug,build=none ,enable-cxx the usual configure , make ,make check On Tuesday 14 April 2009 13:18:16 Bill Hart wrote: > Here is t

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
Yep, it's all ok. So no further issues. I'll post about the release. Bill. 2009/4/15 Jason Moxham : > > The issue with the "double" install was > > libgmpxx depends on libgmp, so it will not install the first time > > after deleting all mpir/gmp from paths, just tried on my linux box , and it >

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Jason Moxham
The issue with the "double" install was libgmpxx depends on libgmp, so it will not install the first time after deleting all mpir/gmp from paths, just tried on my linux box , and it takes two goes to install it On Wednesday 15 April 2009 00:40:46 Bill Hart wrote: > I already adjusted the docs.

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 14, 4:40 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > I already adjusted the docs. If you are *absolutely sure*, I will > revert the doc changes. > > Bill. Ok, we still do need it on Linux, but it does work as required. I find it strange it works on OSX, but not on Linux, but we can worry about that post 1.0

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
I already adjusted the docs. If you are *absolutely sure*, I will revert the doc changes. Bill. 2009/4/15 mabshoff : > > > > On Apr 13, 10:03 pm, Bill Hart wrote: >> It's up on the site:www.mpir.org >> >> This fixes some (more) issues we had with linking mpir with libtool. >> If this is fixed,

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 13, 10:03 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > It's up on the site:www.mpir.org > > This fixes some (more) issues we had with linking mpir with libtool. > If this is fixed, it *will* be MPIR 1.0.0. > > Bill. Ok, the libtool issue with libgmpxx.la depending on libmpir has been resolved on OSX 10.5: #

[mpir-devel] Status on parallel algorithms and benchmark

2009-04-14 Thread jmakov
Hi. Can someone tell us the status of parallel algorithms in MPIR and give some benchmarks in respect with GMP? Tnx, jernej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group,

[mpir-devel] MPIR 1.1.0 testing (volunteers sought)

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
Here is the latest test matrix: iras 4.1.2 ncmk +cmk / 4.3.3 ncmk +cmk eno - 4.3.0 ncmk fcmk +cmk;parallel build is VERY slow cleo 4.1.2 ncmk +cmk / 4.3.3 ncmk +cmk cicero 4.3.0 ncmk fcmk +cmk varro A 4.0.1 ncmk +cmk / 4.3.3 ncmk +cmk ;broken parallel build fulvia 4.3.3 ncmk fcmk