On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:57:36 -0800
Case Van Horsen wrote:
> >> Can we define a macro (HAVE_MPIR_SI ?) to unambiguously detect if
> >> mpir_si/mpir_ui is available?
> >
> > I can put HAVE_MPIR_UI and HAVE_MPIR_SI into mpir.h if this
> > would do the trick.
> A single define, say HAVE_MPIR_INTS, wo
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Cactus wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:37:09 -0800
> Case Van Horsen
>
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Cactus wrote:
>> >> To reinforce that these new types are MPIR specific, should they
>> >> be called mpir_ui/mpir_si?
>> >
>> > I had exactly the same idea a
TEST - Please ignore.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:37:09 -0800
Case Van Horsen
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Cactus wrote:
> >> To reinforce that these new types are MPIR specific, should they
> >> be called mpir_ui/mpir_si?
> >
> > I had exactly the same idea a few days ago - I am inclined to do
> > this.
> A cou
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Cactus wrote:
>> To reinforce that these new types are MPIR specific, should they be called
>> mpir_ui/mpir_si?
>
> I had exactly the same idea a few days ago - I am inclined to do this.
A couple more ideas...
Can we define a macro (HAVE_MPIR_SI ?) to unambiguousl
> To reinforce that these new types are MPIR specific, should they be called
mpir_ui/mpir_si?
I had exactly the same idea a few days ago - I am inclined to do this.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To view this discussi
> To reinforce that these new types are MPIR specific, should they be called
mpir_ui/mpir_si?
I had exactly the same idea a few days ago - I am inclined to go this.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To view this discussi
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Cactus wrote:
> Hi Case,
>
> I think the ability to build using any of the compilers you mention would be
> a good addition. Jason maintains the command line build so the changes
> would need to go to him.
I'll send copies to Jason when I'm finished with them.
>
Hi Case,
I think the ability to build using any of the compilers you mention would
be a good addition. Jason maintains the command line build so the changes
would need to go to him.
MPFR builds with mpir-exp and all tests pass. MPC also builds with
mpir-exp but one test currently fails due
