On Apr 5, 10:00 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> There is an somewhat interesting article about "A First Look at the
> Larrabee New Instructions (LRBni)" at
>
> http://www.ddj.com/hpc-high-performance-computing/216402188
>
> You might want to read the print version since that one is all on one
> page. I
On Jan 13, 2:38 am, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > The other issue here is that there are multiple algorithms here and it
> > > is quite likely that very small examples will use the basic xgcd which
> > > may well guarantee minimality. Only if you have say hundreds of
> > > thousands of bi
On Nov 28, 5:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> .align 16
> mpn_add_n:
> mov $0,carryreg
> .align 16
> mpn_add_nc:
> here is the usual stuff
>
> Here we either align it and have to skip over 16 bytes (which is at least 1
> extra cycle) or we dont bother with the alignment for the _nc version , and
On Nov 23, 7:43 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Well, after a bit more reading, I now think that bitwise shifting is
> available. I was confused because all the floating point operations
> are explicitly listed whereas for the integer operations only the
> "atomic" operations are
