After testing on piles of machines, no test failures with make check. Yay.
Once Brian has finished putting the Windows tuning values in and other
tuning values stop coming in, I'll make our first beta. The library
seems pretty solid now.
Bill.
On 24 October 2012 02:31, Bill Hart wrote:
> The va
The values looked ok compared to other similar machines.
Bill.
On 24 October 2012 01:30, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> Thanks Jeff. I didn't have the Nehalem values yet, so I've just put
>> those into my local copy. Will commit later.
>
> Don't
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Thanks Jeff. I didn't have the Nehalem values yet, so I've just put
> those into my local copy. Will commit later.
Don't forget that is for ICC so I'm not sure if GCC values will be
different or if that matters.
Jeff.
--
You received this mes
Thanks Jeff. I didn't have the Nehalem values yet, so I've just put
those into my local copy. Will commit later.
Bill.
On 23 October 2012 21:04, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
>> Is there any chance you could send me the output of make tune on
>>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Is there any chance you could send me the output of make tune on
> whichever machines it actually works on (from memory you may have to
> go into the tune directory to run it). I'll also need the output of
> config.guess in each case.
Linux 2.6
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Is there any chance you could send me the output of make tune on
> whichever machines it actually works on (from memory you may have to
> go into the tune directory to run it). I'll also need the output of
> config.guess in each case.
Linux 2.6
Hi Jeff,
that looks promising! Thanks.
Is there any chance you could send me the output of make tune on
whichever machines it actually works on (from memory you may have to
go into the tune directory to run it). I'll also need the output of
config.guess in each case.
Bill.
On 23 October 2012 20
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> OK, alpha6 is now up. I didn't touch the choke test, as I think it
> shouldn't be causing the problem. But now configure should run the
> right gcc test.
Alpha 6 is now configuring properly with ICC. Here are some test
results on various Linux
OK, alpha6 is now up. I didn't touch the choke test, as I think it
shouldn't be causing the problem. But now configure should run the
right gcc test.
Let me know if it still causes any issues.
Bill.
On 23 October 2012 18:16, Bill Hart wrote:
> Oh, I know what is wrong. I need to run autoconf be
Oh, I know what is wrong. I need to run autoconf because it generates
configure from acinclude.m4.
Give me a few minutes and I'll rectify this.
Bill.
On 23 October 2012 18:04, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
>> * (hopefully) fixes an issue with t
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> * (hopefully) fixes an issue with the Intel C Compiler noted by Jeff Gilchrist
It still blows up. Looking at config.log I see:
cclist=gcc icc cc
configure:4996: icc -c conftest.c >&5
conftest.c(2): error: identifier "choke" is undefined
Hi all,
I've uploaded another alpha version of mpir-2.6.0 to our website:
http://mpir.org/
This
* (hopefully) fixes an issue with the Intel C Compiler noted by Jeff Gilchrist
* exports mpn_sumdiff_n unconditionally (needed by flint's fft)
* moves some more internal fft prototypes into gmp-impl.h
12 matches
Mail list logo
