On 05/17/2010 12:01 PM, Cactus wrote:
>
>
> On May 17, 11:13 am, Antony Vennard wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>
> [snip]
>
>> As I understand it, mingw (gcc on windows) has the same problem - it
>> doesn't support x86-64 compilation. I'm not 100% on that - last I tried
>> msys on win64 was about two ye
On May 17, 11:13 am, Antony Vennard wrote:
> Hi Brian,
[snip]
> As I understand it, mingw (gcc on windows) has the same problem - it
> doesn't support x86-64 compilation. I'm not 100% on that - last I tried
> msys on win64 was about two years ago and back then msys itself just seg
> faulted wh
Hi Brian,
Thanks for that, having slept on it I think you're right. My concern,
waking up this morning and thinking about it was not generating assembly
from C code (this is a case of applying specs) but producing something
that is optimised - a key part of writing anything that relies on speed,
r
On May 17, 12:04 am, Antony Vennard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding BSDNT (BSD Licensed MPIR) I think Bill mentioned targetting
> pcc earlier on in conversation (cl/icc/gcc have also been mentioned as I
> remember it). One thing that was suggested was porting pcc to Win64,
> something I've been h