[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
Yep, it's all ok. So no further issues. I'll post about the release. Bill. 2009/4/15 Jason Moxham : > > The issue with the "double" install was > > libgmpxx depends on libgmp, so it will not install the first time > > after deleting all mpir/gmp from paths, just tried on my linux box , and it >

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Jason Moxham
The issue with the "double" install was libgmpxx depends on libgmp, so it will not install the first time after deleting all mpir/gmp from paths, just tried on my linux box , and it takes two goes to install it On Wednesday 15 April 2009 00:40:46 Bill Hart wrote: > I already adjusted the docs.

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 14, 4:40 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > I already adjusted the docs. If you are *absolutely sure*, I will > revert the doc changes. > > Bill. Ok, we still do need it on Linux, but it does work as required. I find it strange it works on OSX, but not on Linux, but we can worry about that post 1.0

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Hart
I already adjusted the docs. If you are *absolutely sure*, I will revert the doc changes. Bill. 2009/4/15 mabshoff : > > > > On Apr 13, 10:03 pm, Bill Hart wrote: >> It's up on the site:www.mpir.org >> >> This fixes some (more) issues we had with linking mpir with libtool. >> If this is fixed,

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 1.0.0 Release Candidate 10 (TEN!!)

2009-04-14 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 13, 10:03 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > It's up on the site:www.mpir.org > > This fixes some (more) issues we had with linking mpir with libtool. > If this is fixed, it *will* be MPIR 1.0.0. > > Bill. Ok, the libtool issue with libgmpxx.la depending on libmpir has been resolved on OSX 10.5: #