I found another Ultrasparc2 which is set up correctly (same linux),
and the MPIR C++ tests pass no problems. So this confirms my belief
that gcc54 was just set up wrongly.
I'm going to close the longstanding ticket we have open for that, and
I'll just build on the other machine I have found, in fu
Thanks, I'll add that to the matrix.
2010/1/29 Gonzalo Tornaria :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> The tests have passed on Cygwin32/k8. I've updated the website, so
>> there are fewer blanks now.
>>
>> We still need test reports for k7, i7, OSX PPC, alphaev56, netburst,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> The tests have passed on Cygwin32/k8. I've updated the website, so
> there are fewer blanks now.
>
> We still need test reports for k7, i7, OSX PPC, alphaev56, netburst,
> if anyone has access to any of those.
All tests pass on linux/nehalem (b
The tests have passed on Cygwin32/k8. I've updated the website, so
there are fewer blanks now.
We still need test reports for k7, i7, OSX PPC, alphaev56, netburst,
if anyone has access to any of those.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> Hi all,
>
> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially rel
I forgot to mention, the long deprecated function mpz_random has also
finally been removed.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart :
> Hi all,
>
> it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
> It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
>
> Please note the following important
