It should be easy to verify if it is an issue or not. Until then it
should remain a blocker.
I'll check the test function.
Bill.
2009/1/10 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 4:59 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>> I've added a ticket for the memory leak.
>
> Yeah, I saw the ticket. I am not 100% sure this isn'
On Jan 9, 4:59 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> I've added a ticket for the memory leak.
Yeah, I saw the ticket. I am not 100% sure this isn't a false positive
since the C++ runtime could be involved here and that some times leads
to issues. Either way, I wouldn't consider it a blocker since it has
been
I've added a ticket for the memory leak.
On Jan 10, 12:41 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 9, 4:05 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > OK, I see Jason already fixed the make tune issue. So perhaps the
> > nails issue is all that is left.
>
> > On Jan 9, 11:28 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > > I've added the mis
On Jan 9, 4:05 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> OK, I see Jason already fixed the make tune issue. So perhaps the
> nails issue is all that is left.
>
> On Jan 9, 11:28 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > I've added the missing gcd prototypes to gmp-impl.h.
>
> > What else do we need to do before release?
>
> >
OK, I see Jason already fixed the make tune issue. So perhaps the
nails issue is all that is left.
On Jan 9, 11:28 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> I've added the missing gcd prototypes to gmp-impl.h.
>
> What else do we need to do before release?
>
> * fix make tune
>
> * fix nails = 2
>
> Anything else?
