[mpir-devel] Re: pathscale on cato

2009-04-10 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 10, 8:18 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > 2009/4/11 mabshoff : > >> Anyhow, make and make check now work fine on cato with pathcc. > > > Are the default flags still not using optimization? > > I don't understand the question. > > If gcc is used, it uses optimisation -O2. If pathscale is used it

[mpir-devel] Re: pathscale on cato

2009-04-10 Thread Bill Hart
2009/4/11 mabshoff : > > > > On Apr 10, 8:13 pm, Bill Hart wrote: >> I've added support as per Mariah's recommendation in trunk. It only >> supports ABI=64 not n32 so I've changed that to the first one tried >> for that arch. I had to edit acinclude.m4 to make sure it excluded >> pathcc from the

[mpir-devel] Re: pathscale on cato

2009-04-10 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 10, 8:13 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > I've added support as per Mariah's recommendation in trunk. It only > supports ABI=64 not n32 so I've changed that to the first one tried > for that arch. I had to edit acinclude.m4 to make sure it excluded > pathcc from the list of compilers it tested to