I don't know any reason why it wouldn't work. Shouldn't even need to make a copy of
CKBR--just run two instances. Unless, of course, the two different transaction names
help keep your sanity. Yes, if you trigger CKBR, it gets the bridge queue name from
the trigger message. CKBR cannot monitor
I am using the CICS DPL Bridge and it seems to come down with any type of
message errors. The first problem I encountered was a security problem on
the dead letter queue, I fixed that, subsequently other messages in error
would bring the bridge down also. I would like to know what methods are
us
Dave,
We currently do archiving to DASD, and let HSM migrate the datasets to tape after 1 day. This eliminates the problems with bad tape headers, no tape drives available, etc. It was very easy to do, just changed the CSQ6ARVP macro in the ZParms member.
Glen Shubert
"Williams, Dave (Sy
Please ,
I'd like to know where can i find ERRORS LOG at
MQSeries MAINFRAME environmnet.
At AIX environment , i can see at :
$ cd /var/mqm/errors$ lsAMQERR01.LOG
AMQERR02.LOG AMQERR03.LOG lost+found
Thanks in advance
Reginaldo S. Rosa
I am using the CICS DPL Bridge and it seems to come down with any type of
message errors. The first problem I encountered was a security problem on
the dead letter queue, I fixed that, subsequently other messages in error
would bring the bridge down also. I would like to know what methods are
us
At a pretty high level, that's exactly right. You may note that the conditions
required for a trigger event are actually somewhat more involved and the
responsibility of the triggered application is to completely drain the queue. Also,
take precautions if you are using syncpoints (and you should
Management wants us to find out what's involved in moving our MQ
(OS/390) 5.3 archiving to DASD - The change looks relatively easy, but
I'm wondering what "pitfalls" are possible. Does anyone out there have
any thoughts on this or have done it at your shops?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Da
I will be out of the office starting December 20, 2002 and will not return
until January 6, 2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http
You can have multiple CKBR transactions running, each against a different
queue if you wish. You don't need a different transaction name, just plain
ol' CKBR will do. The monitor will 'watch' the queue that the request
message is written to, I assume you are triggering the CKBR when a message
arriv
Hi,
There's a supportpac (MA86, MQSeries and Firewalls) that says "MQSeries
behaves just like many other TCPIP applications; e.g. HTTP."
Not sure if this statement applies in any context, but it looks like it
should be working.
I don't think the routers & gateways should worry you. Perhaps respo
Hi Enrico,
They say the answer is "yes" but I did not try it myself. The service packs MS81 and
MA86 will give you all necessary tools and information.
Hope this will help
Pavel
Enrico Strydom
cc:
Sent by: MQSe
I don't have this problem. Are you sure you are allocating 5.3 libraries
for each of the DDNAMES in your TSO logon (SYSEXEC, ISPTLIB, ISPPLIB,
ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB)?
- Bruce Giordano
"Williams, Dave (Systems
Management)" <[EM
Currently, we are attempting to enabling triggering on a
UNISYS 2200 machine. I interpret the documentation as stating when the
queue depth with a process definition defined goes from zero to
a non-zero condition (FIRST) a trigger message is put an initiation
queue, which the trigger monito
We currently use a VPN connection over the net between two queue managers.
The performance is dependent upon net traffic, which, at times, raises a
channel indoubt connection for short periods.
Enrico Strydom
cc:
S
So long as both your machine and the other machine have DNS entries so they
can use DNS to look up the other machine's IP address, then it should work.
At one stage, the IP address of a qmgr needed to be fixed, but as of (I
think) MQ 5.2, the IP address can move so long as the DNS name remains
fix
Title: RE: MQ Wrapper - who has built one vs AMI?
Dave, someone
mentioned this just the other day/week. He may have mentioned a fix for it --
was it that a SCQSTBLE file was added? (That may not have been the fix for the
PF4 thing, so don't take it as gospel). I'm not a V5.3 yet, so am not speak
MQ has an extension called "internet pass-thru" (MQIPT) which tunnels the
MQ channels inside HTTP. There is a document, MS81 SCRIPT on IBM MQ
website which explains how to do it. I haven't had an opportunity to
try it. Would love to know how it works out for you. Thanks
En
I will be out of the office starting December 21, 2002 and will not return
until January 13, 2003.
I am on leave but will check email ...
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.
I have set up the CICS Bridge and everything works fine. I have a couple
of questions. Is it possible to start more than one Bridge Monitor task
(CKBR)? Another words can I copy CKBR to another transaction name and run
that at the same time CKBR is running and each monitor a different request
que
Well maybe if the powers that be will satisfy your request they would also
come up with a command line utility for stopping a flow also. I would
appreciate one of those!! Your only other alternative to that is to GET
INHIBIT the input queue.
bobbee
From: "Dawson, John" <[EMAIL P
Have a look at the Internet Pass-thru support pac MS81.
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/ts/mqseries/txppacs/ms81.html
This may be what you need...
Regards
John Scott
Senior Middleware Technical Specialist
Argos Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: Enrico Strydom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to connect two queue managers using
sender/receiver channels over the internet?
gut-feel says maybe not (I do not have the facilities to test this)
If you are connected to your service provider and you can ping the IP
address of the other queue manger i
Title: RE: MQ Wrapper - who has built one vs AMI?
I’m not
certain if any of you have experienced this (or is it just a problem w/my
CSQ0REXX exec?), but w/our upgrade to 5.3 our PF4 prompt key doesn’t give
a complete list of objects. It DOES indicate that there are “more”,
but PF8 just
23 matches
Mail list logo
