This email and any attachments are confidential. They may
contain privileged information and are intended for the
named addressee(s) only. They must not be distributed
without our consent. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify us immediately and do not disclose, distribute
or retain
Hi Paul,
Can I report a problem? I find that the facility in mo71 that allows one to
manage a queue manager via an intermediary doesn't seem to work in mqsc.
Here are the messages, both from a Windows client:
---
AIX via AIX from W
Hi,
We are currently
consolidating our TRU64(version V5.1 2650 alpha) servers and have decided to run
multiple QMGRs in a clustered TRU64 environment.In the 'Quick Beginnings for
TRU64 v5.1' this is the kernel parameters that should be
set:ipc:sem-mni=4096sem-msl=1000sem-opm=100sem-ume=1
Oops, yes, I forgot about 'via' queue managers. Sorry about that. Via
Queue Managers is a bit more complicated.
I'll look into it but I can't promise when I'll get around to it. Too busy
with my day job.
Cheers,
P.
Paul G Clarke
WebSphere MQ Development
IBM Hursley
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM Website indicates that for the Link to R/3 , its only certified
with Solaris 8 and upto MQ Version 5.2. Other Operatating systems
indicate greater than 5.x.
Anybody know if the Link to R/3 is good with Solaris 9 and MQ V5.3? We are
getting ready to replace our servers and the Admin's wo
Title: RE: MQ maintenance
In a similar vein, does anyone know when the next version of MQ for distributed platforms will be released?
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Carroll, Y. (Yvette)
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:06 AM
To: MQ mailing list (E-mail)
Subject
They let you out during the day??? Or did someone leave the door to you cell
unlocked (-:
From: Paul Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQSC client - MO72 Problem (indirect queue manager management)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 1
Title: MQ maintenance
Hi all
I know the MQ for MVS or Z/OS maintenance is released regularly, every 6 months.
Is there a similar schedule for the distributed platforms?
Thanks.
Kind regards
Yvette Carroll
Nedbank
Limited Reg No 1951/09/06Directors: WAM Clewlow (Chairman) Pro
Title: RE: MQ maintenance
Yes (it won't be this year).
Dave
Fellow Listers,
We are in the process of upgrading from z/OS 1.4 to 1.5 and from Websphere
MQ from 5.3.0 to 5.3.1. Periodically we correctly receive messages
CSQX544E and CSQX548E indicating that messages have been placed in the
dead letter queue.
With the z/OS 1.5 and MQ 5.3.1 combination, these
Is it possible that you have some sort
of message suppression activated on z/OS 1.5, such as a third-party product,
or locally developed WTO exits?
George J Shedlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/12/2004 03:45 PM
Please respond to
MQSeries List <[EMAIL
No MPF exits or MPF table suppression in place either before (z/OS 1.4) or
after (z/OS 1.5). Also no new products that might suppress messages.
George Shedlock Jr
RDC - 972-471-8640
PDC - 212-855-8675
Rick Tsujimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/12/2004 03:0
Env: Solaris 5.8, WMQ 5.3 (CSD05)
We have an annoying situation where we are periodically receiving tcp/ip
errors in the MQ error logs. This causes our cluster channels to
terminate [abnormally]. It's a transient error, because the channel
immediately retries and successfully restarts and everythi
Is your ROUTCDE parm in the CSQ6SYSP
macro set to 1?
George J Shedlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/12/2004 04:20 PM
Please respond to
MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Messages not appearing
on SYSLOG
Group
I'm having a strange problem with ZOS 1.5 and MQ 5.3.1.. We no long get the CSQ error messages in the CHIN when a record
goes to a remote DLQ or comes into the DLQ from a Channel.
Any thoughts?
Rich
George
Great minds
Rich
Rick Tsujimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/12/2004 04:27 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Richard Jackson/DTCC)
Subject: Re: Messages
Title: Message
Yikes. I think it is a good practice to routinely restart the
browse first after you get to the end. However, this has much broader
implications. The extreme case would be a very busy queue that seldom
empties? Then you have unattended messages at the top of the queue while t
Dear Listers,
Due to the large number of critical projects in our systems infrastructure group, JPMorganChase & Co is currently looking for highly talented WebSphere MQ systems programmers and admins. This position will support MQ on both Mainframe and UNIX (AIX and Solaris) platforms. The ideal c
18 matches
Mail list logo