I will be out of the office starting 11/25/2004 and will not return until
11/29/2004.
I will respond to your message when I return. If you need immediate
assistance please contact Lawrence Coombs x63064
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv Genera
Carol,
It will take you around 30,000 4k buffers for each
100 meg message that you intend to have memory
resident.
100*1048576/3600=29127 rounded or,
room for 9 100meg messages, per gig of memory.
You'll want to turn on SMF115 records, uses not so
much disk and the performance hit is arounf 5%.
My boss is not Bill Gates, but he still wants to downsize the sun machines
to Intel and as for wanting the Corvette well I want the Ferrari!!!
You don't need to tell me about J2EE being better I know that for sure, but
we have a lot of .NET code that will need to work with other platforms and I
wa
Hi Dave,
On what platform do you wish to do it?
Using COM+ gives you pooling for C++ on windows, as for other
platforms, we needed to write code, but that was a long time ago...
Cheers
Didi
- Original Message -
From: "David C. Partridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: T
We have large messages ranging from 1-100Meg. I think my number of buffers
is too low. What does anyone suggest for # of buffers, especially for a
100Meg message?
Also, do you recommend increasing the region size if I substantially
increase the number of buffers? If so, best guess on how much?
I've always been intrigued what sort of apps actually create such large
messages. Personally, I always felt MQ was designed to promote
transactional processing and for distributing informational (non-persistent,
pub-sub) messages. But, as with any product, users always find new ways to
use it in w
MQ Java support the concept of a connection pool, but there doesn't seem to
be a similar piece in the C++ API.
Anyone been there and done that?
Regards,
David C. Partridge
Technical Products Director
Primeur Security Services
Tel: +44 (0)1926 511058
Mobile: +44 (0)7713 880197
Instructions for ma
Hi,
So, you are in a Ford dealership wanting to buy a Mustang but saying you want
the features and color of a Corvette!?!?!
Now maybe your boss is Bill Gates but seriously, if you want J2EE features then
why don't you just use Java?
It can't be a cost issue. You can get almost everything for fre
Didi,
You'll have to share the cost information, more
detail about applications that you run and the
messaging volume trends at your shop if you want a
'real world' answer. Some questions...
Why did you not convert to MQ v5.2 for os/390 2.10?
MQ 5.3.1 will run on os/390 2.10 - did you know?
In w
Hi Peter,
We already did the 5.3.1 and 1.4 upgrade, but some issues are hindering the
1.4 upgrading and we are considering
going with one and not the other...
Thanks for you input,
Cheers
Didi
PS - I am still looking for someone that had this combo in production
running at least a million messag
Hi Didi,
Whilst we never got around to actually running 5.3.1 on OS/390 2.10 in
production (the upgrade to z/OS 1.4 got in just before it) we did test
that combination and didn't have a problem. 5.3.1 is supported on OS/390
2.10. Might want to check the more recent fixes for any incompatibility
th
Hello All,
I need to know from real people not from a website and quotes is the
following configuration recommended:
a.. WebSphere MQ 5.3.1 for Z/OS with the latest fixes
b.. OS/390 2.10 ( I will send put level if anybody thinks it will help)
Well does anybody think we should go this way
Title: MQ and SAP Business Connector
Hi
Andre,
What
is the version of SAP BC you are using??..
If the
vesrion is 4.0.1, then you have to install Webmethods
WMQ Adapter3.0.
After
installing adapter, a) you have to add MQ queue manager by clicking
Server settings in messaging adapter.
b)
C
Title: MQ and SAP Business Connector
Hi,
I would like to know if there is anyone out there using SAP Business connector to send messages to / from WMQ? And if so, is there a specific adaptor required to set it up or can Business Connector be configured to communicate with WMQ directly?
Than
Sid/Roger,
The reason I want to use JMS rather then the MQ.NET API is because lets face
it, the .NET API is far from being really object-oriented, it very much like
coding procedural using an OO language. Now that would fine if we were
writing VB code, but we have a lot of Java know-how and we w
15 matches
Mail list logo
