immediately. In
some case, we found that we may need to put some test
message into the new cluster queue to make it
effective. However, this approach is not feasible in
a production environment.
K K
--- Morag Hughson [EMAIL PROTECTED] $:.e!G
A partial repository will publish information (about
? If there is
document or redbooks or share presentation (or bibles)
on this, I would be very appreciate to know about
them.
TIA
K K
L
_
%21~'^!B6:q!B$p,P,P...
v:)9aAn 1!$_3sC4
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/
Instructions
Dear all,
I learnt from MQ manuals that many MQ runtime modules
has to be relinked for
each LE/TCPIP patch/upgrade etc..
My question is whether the relink applies to other IBM
product like CICS WAS
etc..Besides, does the HOLD document of LE tells
that System programming
that relink of MQ or
Dear all,
We have Servet application running on WAS, which
get/put message on MQQ of
WMQ for z/OS. At this moment, we allow WEBPUB to
have full authorities on
GET/PUT message on MQQ.
Is it possible to gratitude the RACF authorities on
servlet/program/transaction level to have more tighter
Dear ALL,
We have Java programs using WMQ on Linux to communicate with other systems.
We found that if the program run in 'Client Mode', we only neet to grant
MQCONN authority to that program to access WMQ. However, if the program
run in 'Server Mode', we need to grant ALL authorites to that
We use the naming convention of queue manager.mqm.country.company
name.We have a meeting among the MQA of all platforms on differentiate
the range of queue manager name to be used. Having done that, the above
dns is unique within our company.
- Original Message -
From: Crupi,
We note this after migration from MQ2.1 to MQ5.3.0 in particular when the
network is not stable. We use ADOPTMCA=YES and ADOPTCHK=YES to alleviate
the problem.
- Original Message -
From: Salem Muribi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:02 PM
topology which each site
contribute
two gateway queue managers and the queue managers are connected in a bus.
What is your opinion on this topology? Any concern we need to look at
for
Bus-and-Spoken?
TIA
K K
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
Using DNS name could free us from caring IP address
change. It appears that after DNS resolution (at channel
start), the queue manager is in fact talking in IP address.
Hence, I guess the performance improvement only appears at channel startup, if
any. However, how often will the channel
Dear All,
One user is asking for a publish-and-subscribe function using
MQSeries on zSeries. I have looked up IBM web site and it appears
that there were many similar and confusing choices. There are Event
Broker (WMQSEB), Integration Message Broker (WMQSIB) and WMQI. I
would like to seek
Dear all,
We are studying the implementation of MQ Clustering for CICS
systems and would like to seek your advice on the following issue.
For instance, we have two MQ Managers (say MQ21 and MQ22) forming a cluster with
the alias name MQ2X
1. CouldCICS connect to the alias
queue manager
Dear all,
I am looking for any benchmark on the performance of
persistent vs non-persistent message, in particular on CPU consumption. Do
you know of any redbook or manual or web site has such report?
TIA
KK
It appears that it is written for MQ5.2? Has anyone tried it on MQV5.3?
Any precaution to take before using it for MQ5.3?
TIA
- Original Message -
From: Jan van Kemenade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Analysis of MQ SMF
I would like to know where there is an performance evaluation on the
overhead of using SSL on MQV5.3. Besides, any experience on the usage of
SSL on MQ (e.g. stability, overhead, concerns etc) in particular on the
comparison with other MQ encryption tool such as MQSecure or 'Data Secure'.
KK
Rick,
According to the Concept and Planning Guide for z/OS, MQ5.3 needs DB2 only
when you need queue sharing group.
KK
- Original Message -
From: Rick Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:44 AM
Subject: WMQ V5.3 for Z/OS and DB2 6.1 as
at the Tech Conference. They gave some hints
on things which helped when I tested. Overall, experience on at least 2 of
the main platforms (NT, MVS, UNIX) is what you need.
glen larson
zurich north america
K K [EMAIL PROTECTED]@AKH-Wien.AC.AT on 01/01/2003 01:20:26 AM
Please respond to MQSeries List
Manish,
Do you get error message on CICS or DB2 log? I think the userid assigned
to the MQ triggered transaction is different from the one which does not
encountered problem.
Could you try to assign same userID to the MQ triggered transaction?
KK
Original Message Follows
From:
Dear MQers,
Have you attended MQ certification? Do you find it useful?
Which of them are most useful? How to prepare for it? Is it possible
to prepare without attending IBM classes?
K K
Dear MQer,
We are planning an MQ2.1 to MQ5.3 upgrade exercise. Do you mind share your
experience on it, in particular on area that needs special attention.
Thank you.
KK
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 3 months
19 matches
Mail list logo
