:
Subject:Re: LSX and WMQ of NT 5.3
Domino 6 supports Java 1.3.1, but I found no problems with MQ 5.2.1 and R5.
Steve
MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
... It's fine for IBM to say just use Java, ...
Just a question: MQv53 is _really_ working with Lotus Notes' embeddded
JVM? AFAIK
Domino 6 supports Java 1.3.1, but I found no problems with MQ 5.2.1 and R5.
Steve
MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
... It's fine for IBM to say just use Java, ...
Just a question: MQv53 is _really_ working with Lotus Notes' embeddded
JVM? AFAIK, Notes JVM is on level 1.1.8, but MQ
Jim,
... It's fine for IBM to say just use Java, ...
Just a question: MQv53 is _really_ working with Lotus Notes' embeddded
JVM? AFAIK, Notes JVM is on level 1.1.8, but MQ Java API supported the
version 1.3.0 or above.
So how can a Notes developer work with MQv53?
Tibor
I'm also
Hi,
I know the DOC says that LSX support is dropped in V5.3. But our
application folks what me to verify whether that means it will not work, or
is just not supported. I told them it doesn't matter just use JAVA, but
they insist. (kind of like the old MACRO v COMMAND level debate for the
old
Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:LSX and WMQ of NT 5.3
Hi,
I know the DOC says that LSX support is dropped in V5.3. But our
application folks what me to verify whether that means
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: LSX and WMQ of NT 5.3
I'm also interested in this. It's fine for IBM to say just use Java,
but we've got LSX programmers, not Java programmers. I don't care how
similar the languages are, some of these people are guaranteed to be
befuddled by any change. Any at all
