PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQ Channel Communication Overhead and Limited
Bandwidth---multiple channels
Yes, the messages are persistent, I understand that causes additional
throughput issues because of the logging of messages. I would however, like
to eliminate the bandwidth issue before I go off
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: MQ Channel Communication Overhead and Limited
>Bandwidth---multiple channels
>Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:11:48 -0400
>
>Bill
>
>I know that this is an apples to orang
Are they and do they have to be persistent
From: Richard Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQ Channel Communication Overhead and Limited
Bandwidth---multiple channels
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2
>
From: Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MQ Channel Communication Overhead and Limited
Bandwidth
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have a customer in Germany, who is displeased with the throughput he is
> getting with his client connection to
erson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TA.AERO> cc: (bcc: Richard Jackson/SIAC)
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: MQ Channel Communication
Overhead and Limited Bandwidth
If the messages consist of text, then compressing them should give you a
big boost.
Bill Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ITA.AERO>cc:
Sent by: S
I have a customer in Germany, who is displeased with the throughput he is
getting with his client connection to my server in Atlanta. Please see the
encrypt from an email I received from him below.
Relating to our 32Bit-Frame-Relay-Connection between Germany and Atlanta,
I've some more questions.
