log message remains
even the message was not delivered.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Devitt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
**
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom
of this message.
**
:
In the situation I referred to we had some reasonably i
other messages outside of syncpoint, lest you could risk false
positives in your exit message queue.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Clarke [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Message not visible in Q
&
>I suppose, in the interest of performance, an NPMSPEED channel could skip
>the syncpoint for batches that contain all non-persistent messages. Paul,
>can you confirm that? If so, it may raise an issue for the channel exit
that
>is putting messages within syncpoint and unbeknownst to the MCA.
>An
ED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Message not visible in Q
>
> **
>
> Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OM> cc:
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re: Message not visible in Q
List
10/05/02 03:05 AM
> A change in the persistence of the message now makes the message visible.
> The problem was with sync-point. However i didn't have any control over
> the syncpoint as it was controlled by the channel and therefore making
the
> message persistent forced the commit to happen before being shown in
ng me warm fuzzies. With what we know now, can anyone make sense of what
Arun experienced?
regards,
Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: Raju, Arun - Contingent Staff
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Title: RE: Message not visible in Q
thank you for all your inputs.
A change in the persistence of the message now makes the message visible. The problem was with sync-point. However i didn't have any control over the syncpoint as it was controlled by the channel and therefore makin
olkachev
cc:
Sent by: MQSeriesSubject: Re: Message not visible in Q
List
04/10/2002 04:16
AM
Please respond to
MQSer
OTECTED]cc:
> Subject: Re: Message not visible in Q
Sent by: MQSeries
List
10/03/2002 01:55
PM
Please respond to
Title: Message not visible in Q
And in
addition to the other suggestions (expired and uncommitted), there's always the
possibility that you have accidentally specified a correlid or msgid on your
MQGET and there's nothing that matches that value available. --
Rebecca
Rebecca Bulloc
Have the messages been committed yet? If the messages are not
committed, you see the depth change, but they are not available for
getting or browsing.
Jeff
Jeffrey D. Ross
Certified IBM WebSphere MQ Specialist
TransUnion, LLC
Tel 312 985 2742
Fax 312 466 7997
Nextel 312 296 0904
[EMAIL PROTECTE
And remember that if this is OS/390, the DEFAULT is MQPMO_SYNCPOINT!
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Title: Message not visible in Q
The
messages that are contributing to queue depth could be
either:
1.
Uncommitted - which means you can't see them until they are
committed.
-or-
2.
Expired - Gone forever. You missed your chance to ever see
them.
Peter Potkay IBM
MQSeries Cert
MQPMO_SYNCPOINT?
Stefan
>From: "Raju, Arun - Contingent Staff"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Message not visible in Q
>Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:13:17 -0500
>
>Hi,
>
>I have a channel
Title: Message not visible in Q
Hi,
I have a channel exit that stores all data being sent/recv. from the channels to a Local queue. I am having an issue where i can see that the q depth goes up but when i try to look at the q, the message says that there is no message in the queue.
Do any
17 matches
Mail list logo
