cc:
Subject: Re: SSL performance evaluation
I looked in MP16 and found no mention of the SSL figures to which you are
referring. I am interested in these figures. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks.
Mike Davidson
TSYS MQSeries Tech Support
[EMAIL PROT
So three months ago I made a simple performance test with amqsblst. I
connected two local qmgrs on Win2K and I sent messages in difference
size (1*1 KB, 10*1 MB) w/ and wo/ SSL.
My observations was next:
- significant slowing on small messages (>50%)
- minimal difference in performance on larg
KK,
Not sure if you're looking for W2K performance numbers or not since you
didn't start the thread with W2K in the subject line.
I know that there are currently z/OS figures published in the Performance
Support Pac MP16 on the cost of starting SSL channels and also the cost of
transmitting data
