Lets face it people.WE are in IT...We are ALL STRANGErs
>From: Michael F Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Starting channel as a service on Windows NT/2000
>Date: Fri
://www.mqsolutions.com
"GIES, STEVE"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date Recieved:
10/03/2002 08:24:44 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Bcc
Subject:
Re: Starting channel as a service on
Windows NT/2000
Yes, of course your application
folks won't trust the opinions of the MQSeries
obert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Starting channel as a service on Windows NT/2000
I always thought that when a queue manager came back up the triggers were
reset when the Trigger Monitors came back up. The Chin be
Yes,
of course your application folks won't trust the opinions of the MQSeries
experts within their own company (or consultants that their company as
hired). But strangers off the Internet - they must know what their talking
about!!!
-
Steve
-Original Message-From: Michael F
Mu
ries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Starting channel as a service on Windows NT/2000
>Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:12:18 +1000
>
>In add to the below reply, the purpose of adding channel in the MQSeries
>Service panel is not for only start or stop c
, LLC
http://www.mqsolutions.com
Adiraju S Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Date Recieved:
10/02/2002 07:02:25 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Bcc
Subject:
Re: Starting channel as a service on
Windows NT/2000
Mike,
We had a similar experience in one of our projects saying tha
Mike,
We had a similar experience in one of our projects saying that they want to use
snap-in to even monitor the channel and even implemented in the test
environment, but when we had the exact same issue of the snap-in service of
channel going to "stopped " status, I explained to them indicatin
This
channel service should not be monitored for QMGR health check.
Regards,
Nikhil Samadder
Australia Post
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt, T. Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Starting channel as a service on Windows NT/2000
Mike,
The
Title: Message
Mike -
We've
never added the channels as their own service under the snap-in, just the
channel initiator (which of course is added via the install of MQ). All of
our channels are triggered via the transmission queue. This works just
fine. Inactive channels start when message
Mike,
The
whole point of asynchronicity is that the communication can be down without
affecting the interface between the app and the QMgr. MQ is supposed to
provide reliable messaging over unreliable transport and the mechanisms that
allow a channel to quiesce are a large part of how that go
I am facing an interesting issue regarding
how channels are started and how system administrators and application
developers perceive MQSeries to be "running." I would like
to know of any experience, good or bad, you have had with running channels
this way and your opinion overall.
First - there
11 matches
Mail list logo
