Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-06 Thread Ruzi R
Support > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > 04/03/2003 09:04 PM > > > > Please respond to MQSeries List > > > > > > To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Miller, Dennis
nging in suspense indefinately. Give one of them a shot. > -Original Message- > From: Glen Shubert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 5:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH > > > You may also be g

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMM.COM.AU To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: MQSeries List Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH <[EMAIL PROTECTED] en.AC.AT>

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Glen Shubert
    To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         cc:                 Subject:        Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH Hi Rick Thankyou for thoughts - I think that could be part of the explanation. Though if the queue manager fires one Trigger first then the arrival of another message on the queue will not trigg

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Robert Broderick
Another question is, If the transaction has to single thread why not use ENQ/DEQ? bobbee From: Rick Tsujimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH Date: Thu

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Robert Broderick
ly-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:39:03 +1000 Hi I have once seen this abberrant behaviour of two trigger FIRST firing in CICS - i wonder if anyone can explain why? My CICS transaction is started by TRIGG

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Weinger
Right. I forgot about OPROCS "Jim Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Triggering Z/O

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Weinger
"Jim Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread alan . turnbull
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Trigg

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
PROTECTED] EMM.COM.AU To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: MQSeries ListSubject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread alan . turnbull
TED] TMAIL.COM>cc: Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] AC.AT> 04/04/2

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Robert Broderick
The transaction will not trigger. One of the rules for first is that the queue is not opened for input. From: Ronald Weinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:54

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Jim Ford
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .COM>cc: Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] N.AC.AT>

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Ronald Weinger
re reached. However, have you found a MVS batch trigger monitor ? "Gary P. Klos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: "MQSeries List"

Re: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Dave Corbett
| |Subject: Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH | >---

Triggering Z/OS DLQH CSQUDLQH

2003-04-03 Thread Gary P. Klos
I am setting up to use the Z/OS utility CSQUDLQH, which handles the dead letter queue for a queue manager. What I was thinking was to put a trigger on FIRST on the dead letter queue and once it starts CSQUDLQH, then I could leave it running indefinitely. My question is this, if