Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
Windows/2000 "KANE, TOM M (SBCSI)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Windows/2000

Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread KANE, TOM M (SBCSI)
Do you mean specifically for Windows/2000 or with SP4 across Unix as well? TIA Tom -Original Message- From: Rexford Ballard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3 There are numerous reports of

Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rexford Ballard
D]> Sent by:MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3 In my original posting I meant to say SP4, not SP3. Fat-finger error. It looks like SP4 is now available and would like to know if anyone knows if there's

Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
In my original posting I meant to say SP4, not SP3. Fat-finger error. It looks like SP4 is now available and would like to know if anyone knows if there's any problems using it with WMQ. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide ava