On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:39:13 +0900, Jun Sung Kim (???) wrote:
>Hi again,
Hi,
>Ok. How about this?
>I have a MSX2 machine and replace MSX2 BIOS ROM with MSX BIOS ROM.
>Then does the MSX2 machine work?
It'll depends on what is the hardware of this MSX2. If it has Mapper,
it may not work, since
Hi again,
Maybe some of you misunderstood me...
I want the minimum configuration NOT for MSX standard
but for EXECUTING EXISTING BIOS.
Ok. How about this?
I have a MSX2 machine and replace MSX2 BIOS ROM with MSX BIOS ROM.
Then does the MSX2 machine work?
How about in the reverse case (MSX2 ROM
Patriek Lesparre wrote:
I believe 8kB RAM is the minimum MSX1 requirement.
Not really, an MSX1 can boot with only 4kb.
I haven't inspected the BIOS source code closely enough to say for sure,
but I wouldn't be surprised if the PPI was not necessary. Ofcourse, no
keyboard without it, so the
---
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
- Original Message -
From: "Patriek Lesparre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [MSX] minimum hardware configuration
> Laurens Holst wrote:
> >Afaik MSX 1 BIOS only requi
Hi!
For an MSX1 it will be enough with 8 KB RAM and 16 KB VRAM (if THE MSX RED
BOOK is right about the MSX standard definition).
MSX2 needs at least 64 KB of RAM and 64 KB of VRAM too. But no need of
memory mapper, that's right (MSX2 Technical Handbook).
Kind regards,
Ed Robsy
___
Laurens Holst wrote:
Afaik MSX 1 BIOS only requires 16kB of RAM, and an engine to take care of
several things. Oh, and a VDP, ofcourse. The BIOS will not work without it,
even if it were only for the interrupt it generates.
I believe 8kB RAM is the minimum MSX1 requirement.
I haven't inspected t
Afaik MSX 1 BIOS only requires 16kB of RAM, and an engine to take care of
several things. Oh, and a VDP, ofcourse. The BIOS will not work without it,
even if it were only for the interrupt it generates.
I think an MSX2 has basically the same requirements. Since there is an MSX2
model without a map
Tremolo is therefore certainly NOT a variation in volume, but a (mostly
long) series of really short tones played directly after each other.
However, in popular music, the meaning of the term has been altered by
factories producing keyboards and musical software, because a simple
variation in
