] >No, wrong.
] >Look at the dreaded date field. Almost every vendor as a different way of
] >specifying how to insert date into it's DB system. this means that
] >import/export script generating is DB dependend. Besides talking about dates, Every
]DB vendor that follows the ANSI standard allo
] I would like the format to be verry MSX aware. I would like to use it
] (unchanged) on a real MSX. SQL on MSX isn't done yet.
] So therefore i prefere that the baseformat is flat text, MS(X) -dos style (so
] ended.)
As far as I'm concerned, the server can contain a database with an html
fron
Em qui, 25 jan 2001, Daniel Caetano escreveu:
> >Look at the dreaded date field. Almost every vendor as a different way of
> >specifying how to insert date into it's DB system. this means that
> >import/export script generating is DB dependend. Besides talking about dates,
> >if an american w
>No, wrong.
>Look at the dreaded date field. Almost every vendor as a different way of
>specifying how to insert date into it's DB system. this means that
>import/export script generating is DB dependend. Besides talking about dates,
>if an american writes 2/1/2001 he means the first of februarie
>No, wrong.
>Look at the dreaded date field. Almost every vendor as a different way of
>specifying how to insert date into it's DB system. this means that
>import/export script generating is DB dependend. Besides talking about dates,
>if an american writes 2/1/2001 he means the first of februarie
My 2-cents again.
I'll set my comments on your remark in between the lines :-)
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 16:02, you wrote:
> ok, ok. I'll give my 2 cents as well :-)
>
> - The data is 'protected', for example it's simply not possible to have
> double entries (based on several fields)
Primary k
them
around. But it shouldn't be the argument not to use a database for
structured data.
grtz,
Arno
-Original Message-
From: David Heremans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 15:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: .msx server, SCC/DAC/SRAM (to database or n
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 15:29, you wrote:
> some people figured out in the seventies (or was it the sixties) that
> structured data can be handled more easily in a database. People still
> agree on that idea.
>
> So lets have it... why not use a database??
>
> Arno
Call it a flat-file databa
PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 16:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: .msx server, SCC/DAC/SRAM
Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> Packager ID: Server:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> msxpackbeta beta.msxpack.org
> msxpack msxpack.mirror.
Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> Packager ID: Server:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> msxpackbeta beta.msxpack.org
> msxpack msxpack.mirror.nl
> msxpack release.msxpack.org
> mr_x msx.whatever.com:8080
Just to improve the idea: .msx database servers do
10 matches
Mail list logo
