Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-31 Thread jam
Hola Mark Two !!! M> Tokenized assembler already exists. It's called machine code! 8;D And don't forget RSC2 :) JAM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *MSX Dreams* Apdo. Correos 3294 18080 Granada ... I, Snatcher. MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the bo

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-24 Thread MkII
>> Yeah! Let's for example tokenize CALL as #CD, RET as #C9 etc... > >Well yes, that was the idea. Would assemble really fast, wouldn't it? >And if use #FF as opcode for other things like labels or comments... (#FF >#FF = RST #38). >#21 #00 #00 would then be LD HL,# in the code and >#21 #FF "L

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-23 Thread Laurens Holst
> >JON!!! Listen!!! > > > >Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: 1. the > >assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and 2. the size of the > >.ASM-files will be reduced a lot! > > Tokenized assembler already exists. It's called machine code! 8;D Mwa. Machine

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-23 Thread Laurens Holst
> > JON!!! Listen!!! > > I'm here!! Hehe... > > Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: 1. the > > assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and 2. the size of the > > .ASM-files will be reduced a lot! > > You can include an option to let the user decide if th

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-23 Thread Laurens Holst
> >Hey... hey!!! > > > >JON!!! Listen!!! > > > >Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: > > 1. the assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and > >2. the size of the .ASM-files will be reduced a lot! > > Yeah! Let's for example tokenize CALL as #CD, RET as #C9 e

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-23 Thread MkII
>JON!!! Listen!!! > >Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: 1. the >assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and 2. the size of the >.ASM-files will be reduced a lot! Tokenized assembler already exists. It's called machine code! 8;D MSX Mailinglist. To

RE: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-22 Thread Boon, Eric
>Hey... hey!!! > >JON!!! Listen!!! > >Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: > 1. the assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and >2. the size of the .ASM-files will be reduced a lot! Yeah! Let's for example tokenize CALL as #CD, RET as #C9 etc... :-) E

Re: Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-22 Thread Jon De Schrijder
Laurens Holst wrote: > > > - source length limit of about 20K, even though the source is tokenized, > > this is not enough (especially comments take lots of space) > > Hey... hey!!! > > JON!!! Listen!!! I'm here!! > > Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: 1.

Compass improvement??? Jon! Listen!

1999-07-22 Thread Laurens Holst
> - source length limit of about 20K, even though the source is tokenized, > this is not enough (especially comments take lots of space) Hey... hey!!! JON!!! Listen!!! Can't you tokenize the source in Compass??? This has two advantages: 1. the assembling-speed will be increased drastically, and