] > Below, you can find the registersettings needed to reproduce the opll
] > hardware instruments on an OPL1. With thanks to Bernard Lamers and Hans
] > Guijt for this information:
] >
] > Nr Register settingsName
]
] Are these extracted from the OPLL chip (they are not in the msx-music
> > Hans Guijt has used this information to emulate the fm-pac on fMSX
amiga,
> > using the OPL3 of an amiga sound extension card.
> > For most fm-pac based games, you don't hear any difference between a
real MSX
> > and fMSX amiga!
>
> This is pretty cool. I wished fMSX-DOS had this
> sound quali
> Below, you can find the registersettings needed to reproduce the opll
> hardware instruments on an OPL1. With thanks to Bernard Lamers and Hans
> Guijt for this information:
>
> Nr Register settingsName
Are these extracted from the OPLL chip (they are not in the msx-music
rom afaik) o
] Alex Wulms wrote:
] > Differences are minor. In general, you can say
] > that the OPL1 is a superset of the OPLL. There
] > are only two functions which the OPLL has but
] > which the OPL1 does not have:
]
] Anyway, this was my point. `:) I didn't say that
] OPL1 couldn't emulate OPLL (just mak
] On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, AkA DanSHakU wrote:
]
] > > Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
] > > the FM-PAC (MSX-Music). I know of no way to create the OPLL hardware
] > > voices on an OPLx chip, unless there is some way to extracht OPL data
] > > for these voices from the OPLL.
]
Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba wrote:
>
> AkA DanSHakU wrote:
> > Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
>
> No way! :) It's a soundchip by Yamaha.
Ok... my mistake... just got a bit confused... i thought that OPL1 was
the chip and OPLL was the BASIC language...sigh...it's been
AkA DanSHakU wrote:
> Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
No way! :) It's a soundchip by Yamaha.
To program the OPLL you use its sound
registers, which are ultimately set by
some ML* program. <:)
You could create a music in Basic, but
it's the macrolanguage interpreter (in
Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
greetz
akai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www
Alex Wulms wrote:
> Differences are minor. In general, you can say
> that the OPL1 is a superset of the OPLL. There
> are only two functions which the OPLL has but
> which the OPL1 does not have:
Anyway, this was my point. `:) I didn't say that
OPL1 couldn't emulate OPLL (just making sure I
was n
Tristan wrote:
>
> > Each and every ad-lib compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac and FM-part
> > of music module, since the ad-lib contains the OPL1 FM-Chip. Each sound
> > blaster compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac, FM-part of music module
> > and ADPCM part of music module, since the sou
] Tristan wrote:
] > This is only partly true. First, the OPL chip used on ADLIBs is not
] > called OPL1. Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
]
] OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
] OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
] chips and d
Tristan wrote:
> This is only partly true. First, the OPL chip used on ADLIBs is not
> called OPL1. Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
chips and delivers exactl
> Each and every ad-lib compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac and FM-part
> of music module, since the ad-lib contains the OPL1 FM-Chip. Each sound
> blaster compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac, FM-part of music module
> and ADPCM part of music module, since the soundblaster contains both th
13 matches
Mail list logo
