Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-28 Thread Bruce Barnett
> > Sure, we've only been working on that problem since 1978 or so. > This is one of the reasons I like the musclecard project. If I can have a smartcard-based authentication system, where: 1) I use open standards, and have an interoperable framework 2) I use a multi-app card

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Peter Tomlinson
Michael Bender wrote: Scott Guthery wrote: Is it legal to prevent a consumer from having a phone that they purchased activated on a carrier's network? I go back to the days when it was "illegal" to plug in a non-MaBell phone into your POTS jack at home. Some things are different in Europe: as far

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Michael Bender
Scott Guthery wrote: 1) You only get a crippled phone if you want the operator to chip in. >Pay full price on High Street and buy the phone you want. I have heard that Verizon does not want to active a "non-Verizon" phone on their network. I don't have first-hand experience with this, so this m

RE: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Scott Guthery
- From: Michael Bender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 10/27/2004 6:32 PM To: Peter Tomlinson Cc: MUSCLE Subject: Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions Peter Tomlinson wrote: > Like you say in your footer, Michael: Ne

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Michael Bender
Peter Tomlinson wrote: Like you say in your footer, Michael: Never give up! Never surrender! Yeah, but that refers to faster-than-light travel in a spaceship modeled after a TV show and commanded by has-been actors, Peter :-). If we get multi-app cards into the hands of the citizen, why cannot they

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Peter Tomlinson
Like you say in your footer, Michael: Never give up! Never surrender! If we get multi-app cards into the hands of the citizen, why cannot they put what they want (within reason) into them? The big battle at the moment is to get card holder authentication using smart cards sorted out. Peter Micha

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Michael Bender
Peter Tomlinson wrote: It would be great if a developer would implement the eURI concept [1]. Do you think that the big card issuers (banks, governments, etc...) will ever allow something like this? mike -- Michael Bende

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Bruce Barnett
> So, if your "looked-up" data is significantly shorter than 256 bytes, > you may simply use the normal JavaCard mechanism, i.e. Thank you thank you! This is what I wanted to know! And Peter, thanks for the lead about eURI! ___ Muscle mailing list [EM

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-27 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Bruce Barnett wrote: I'd like to experiment with a new Musclecard CardEdgeApplet function where I send the card a byte array, and get a byte array back. I'd like to add capability for the card to store passwords to other systems. It's (for now) a simple table look-up algorithm. I'm looking at so

Re: [Muscle] Some javacard questions

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Tomlinson
It would be great if a developer would implement the eURI concept [1]. Peter [1] eURI is a method for allowing a user to store data in a smart card, data that is under the control of the card holder but may also be supported by a smart card scheme or set of schemes. Data is stored as data object