On 2022-01-08, vicki melchior wrote:
(I'm somewhat late to the fray, but hey, it's interesting stuff with
which I'm well acquainted. Let the flamewars rage on.)
MQA is based on finite rate of innovation sampling (and
reconstruction) theory. Primary authors are M. Unser, M. Vetterli,
P.L. Dr
a bit of an aside because i'm 1) not as technical as Sampo 2) not really
working in pro-audio but this is also a point that someone wanted to make
and I didn't want to reply with a canned response about MQA
https://gearspace.com/board/showpost.php?p=15835460&postcount=460
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at
Very interesting and perceptive take as usual Sampo!
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 8:05 PM Sampo Syreeni wrote:
>
> You just cannot have compact support in
> the time and frequency bases at the same time; this is in fact the most
> basic form of the uncertainty principle (a mathematical theorem about
That seems to be a kind of watermarking. If you take a look at the spectrograms
of the test signals used in this YT video (https://youtu.be/pRjsu9-Vznc), they
seem to embed a band limited noise sequence which looks a bit like that. Maybe
that’s the whole point of MQA: Put a kind of copy protect
Good read Sampo, thanks for taking time to think and write
clearly. Reminds me of that feeling when understanding Godel/Russell,
of once solid ground feeling unsound beneath me.
It's a reminder that the ways we "see" things is just one map, one set
of tools. There's many ways to decompose and reco
On 2022-01-31, STEFFAN DIEDRICHSEN wrote:
That seems to be a kind of watermarking. If you take a look at the
spectrograms of the test signals used in this YT video
(https://youtu.be/pRjsu9-Vznc), they seem to embed a band limited
noise sequence which looks a bit like that. Maybe that’s the wh
