On 20.06.2014, at 17:37, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
> On 6/20/14 10:57 AM, Andrew Simper wrote:
>> On 20 June 2014 17:11, Tim Goetze wrote:
>>
>>> [Andrew Simper]
On 18 June 2014 21:01, Tim Goetze wrote:
> I absolutely agree that this looks to be the most promising approach
>
On 20 June 2014 23:37, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
> well, Kirchoff's laws apply to either linear or non-linear. but the
> methods we know as "node-voltage" (what i prefer) or "loop-current" do
> *not* work with non-linear. these circuits (that we apply the node-voltage
> method to) have depe
Just as a data point; Been measuring and dealing with converter and DSP
throughput latency in the studio since the first digital machines in the early
'80's; my own experience is that anything above 2 or 3 msec of throughput
latency starts to become an issue for professional musicians; 5 msec be
Hi Rich,
On 22/06/2014 1:09 AM, Rich Breen wrote:
Just as a data point; Been measuring and dealing with converter and
DSP throughput latency in the studio since the first digital machines
in the early '80's;
Out of interest, what is your latency measurement method of choice?
my own experien
On 6/21/14, 8:09 AM, Rich Breen wrote:
5 msec becomes very noticable on headphones, and above
6 msec is not usable.
Note that the speed of sound in air is roughly 1125 feet/second. So if a
guitar player is more than 7 feet from their amp then they will have
more than 6 msec of latency.
Fo
I agree, Phil, that the “6 msec is not usable” is not a realistic statement.
First, the brain anticipates. Humans are incredible good at throwing things,
for instance. (In a few minutes, I’m heading out to play basketball and drain
some “threes”.) And the brain needs to tell the hand to release
PS—I actually took Rich’s “6ms is unusable” to mean “unacceptable”, which I do
agree with. For instance, when I had a Korg Trinity, I liked the keyboard
action (61 key) very much in general, but I would *never* enable the combi
mode—it was so slow that it was unacceptable to me, even for the far
On 6/21/14 7:21 AM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
On 20.06.2014, at 17:37, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
On 6/20/14 10:57 AM, Andrew Simper wrote:
On 20 June 2014 17:11, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Andrew Simper]
On 18 June 2014 21:01, Tim Goetze wrote:
I absolutely agree that this looks to be the most
On 6/21/14 10:45 AM, Andrew Simper wrote:
On 20 June 2014 23:37, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
well, Kirchoff's laws apply to either linear or non-linear. but the
methods we know as "node-voltage" (what i prefer) or "loop-current" do
*not* work with non-linear. these circuits (that we apply t
> the underlying physics: Kirchoff's current law, Kirchoff's voltage law, and
> the volt-amp characteristics of each element *is* applicable to any "lumped
> element" circuit, one with any combination of linear or nonlinear elements
> or memoryless or non-memoryless elements. but the Loop-current
> um, it's a semantic thing that i just wrote about in response to Urs. i
> don't use the term myself, but i am defining "nodal analysis" the way i see
> virtually all other lit doing it. when spice is modeling non-linear
> circuits, it is using Kirchoff's current law on every node, Kirchoff's
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
