On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:23:00AM +0200, derGraph wrote:
So could anyone please summarize this? Is there more than a request for a
transliteration AR (which by the proposed guidelines doesn't create
clusters) and a comment on a roadmap?
Basically, yes. The overall thread so far has been that:
Nikki wrote:
Basically, yes. The overall thread so far has been that:
Some points to add:
Dustin exhaustively tried to state why we *should* allow virtual duplicates -
which I think was unnecessary because everyone who still wants to argue against
that is a bit out of reality. ;)
Also it was
On 6/14/06, Chris Bransden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the following discussion arose from this: Schika had examples of
liner notes which differentiate between a mixer and a mix engineer. Do we need
that separated?
well i think you have to be careful as the example (system 7) might
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:01:29PM +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
This point is a bit hazy to me.
Feel free to rephrase it.
What about cases where the official release of a Japanese band is in
English/Latin and someone creates a virtual Japanese/Kana duplicate?
Then the Japanese/Kana version
derGraph wrote:
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
I must admit it was a bit hot when I wrote that and after it I
thought: hmmm.. that's all bullshit. I think you're right, one
general type probably won't work. I have a real life example for you:
I just thought about other real-life examples when I had
Nikki wrote:
Expanding on the last point, there will still be some cases where clusters
would be possible, but focusing on those is silly. We currently have
thousands of transliterations which are lacking a relationship because a
handful of examples (which, in some cases, are just theoretical)
First of all let me make it clear that I am not talking about music released
through iTunes, Napster or similar, which invariably are commercial
releases, available in most retail stores, being released on the net.
What I would like to get a consensus of opinion on is those releases which
Whatever the artist/label/distributor of the release says should be
used. If they state it should be Germany, Europe or Worldwide
then we have to respect that. They are the owners of the rights and
they decide how their data has to be.
--
.: NOP AND NIL :.
.: Schika :.
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +0200, Schika wrote:
Whatever the artist/label/distributor of the release says should be used.
If they state it should be Germany, Europe or Worldwide then we
have to respect that. They are the owners of the rights and they decide
how their data has to be.
On 6/17/06, Nikki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +0200, Schika wrote:
Whatever the artist/label/distributor of the release says should be used.
If they state it should be Germany, Europe or Worldwide then we
have to respect that. They are the owners of the rights
So virtually it appears as if you feel [worldwide] should be deleted
altogether? Or only used when the band says Everywhere else? (which I've
seen one band that says that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schika
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006
On 6/17/06, Beth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So virtually it appears as if you feel [worldwide] should be deleted
altogether? Or only used when the band says Everywhere else? (which I've
seen one band that says that.
No, I'm against a deletion of [Worldwide].
I say that [Worldwide] should be used
12 matches
Mail list logo
