>> > > In masses and ballets, I'd think so - at least I've seen it used that
>> > > way with regards to those. I'm not sure what term would otherwise be
>> > > used for opera and cantantas. (While we're there anyhow, does anyone
>> > > know if there's a term for the collective numbered songs with
>2008/2/7, Brian Schweitzer :
>> >> Off topic, but does anyone know of any example work which does indeed
>> >> have two common names?
>> >
>> >Well, from good old CSGStandard/JSBach:
>> >Kantate, BWV 106 "Gottes Zeit ist die allerbeste Zeit (Actus
>> >tragicus)": I. Sonatina
>> >Both the libretto
2008/2/7, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Off topic, but does anyone know of any example work which does indeed
> >> have two common names?
> >
> >Well, from good old CSGStandard/JSBach:
> >Kantate, BWV 106 "Gottes Zeit ist die allerbeste Zeit (Actus
> >tragicus)": I. Sonatina
> >Both th
2008/2/7, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My suggestion for a simplied release-artist determination tree is this:
>
> 0) The composer is always the track artist.
> 1) All tracks are performed by the same artist, that artist is the
> release-artist.
> 2) All tracks are performed by the same
On Feb 7, 2008 5:45 PM, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > In masses and ballets, I'd think so - at least I've seen it used that
> > > way with regards to those. I'm not sure what term would otherwise be
> > > used for opera and cantantas. (While we're there anyhow, does anyone
>
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
>> Ok, my suggestion was not clear enough. What about operas, masses,
>> cantantas, ballets...? Would the word "Movement" be really appropriate?
>
> In masses and ballets, I'd think so - at least I've seen it used that way
> with regards to those. I'm not sure what te
leivhe wrote:
>
> *bad-looking* Mozart releases
>
Ouch. For "bad-looking", please read "structurally incomplete" or something
(and they might be newly submitted). I was not trying to be ironic, I was
trying to be constructive and friendly.
Sorry for the spam, list
--
View this message in c
I will say in advance, in IRC cooperaa showed me his proposal
immediately after completing it. I had some difficulties with it
then, and forewarned him that I would suggest a counter-proposal.
I think the current proposal is simply a bit overcomplex. It also
leads to a situation which I still, a
>> Off topic, but does anyone know of any example work which does indeed
>> have two common names?
>
>Well, from good old CSGStandard/JSBach:
>Kantate, BWV 106 "Gottes Zeit ist die allerbeste Zeit (Actus
>tragicus)": I. Sonatina
>Both the libretto "Gottes Zeit..." and "Actus tragicus" are usually
>
Aaron:
Lots of thoughtful work on this proposal. Thank you.
Aaron Cooper-3 wrote:
>
> Please take a look at
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistsStyleProposal
> Please share your thoughts and concerns.
>
* I think "How to determine" step 5 should be split into two steps, to m
> Off topic, but does anyone know of any example work which does indeed
> have two common names?
Well, from good old CSGStandard/JSBach:
Kantate, BWV 106 "Gottes Zeit ist die allerbeste Zeit (Actus
tragicus)": I. Sonatina
Both the libretto "Gottes Zeit..." and "Actus tragicus" are usually
printed
> > In masses and ballets, I'd think so - at least I've seen it used that
> > way with regards to those. I'm not sure what term would otherwise be
> > used for opera and cantantas. (While we're there anyhow, does anyone
> > know if there's a term for the collective numbered songs within
> > opera
On Feb 7, 2008 9:46 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/02/2008, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Setting the RA from performance ARs would be much more difficult
> > because we'd have to figure out a way to programatically determine
> > which one of the performance ARs to use
On Feb 6, 2008 4:40 PM, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > >Can you explain "oeuvre"?
> > >
> > > Sure - I used it there in the dictionary's "The sum of the lifework of
> > > an artist, writer, or composer." sense, essentially as one word to
> > > mean the same thing as we've intend
On 07/02/2008, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7-Feb-08, at 4:43 AM, Chris B wrote:
> > On 07/02/2008, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Please take a look at
> >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistsStyleProposal
> >>
> >> Please share your thoughts and conc
On 7-Feb-08, at 4:43 AM, Chris B wrote:
On 07/02/2008, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please take a look at
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistsStyleProposal
Please share your thoughts and concerns.
i suppose i should say what i said in the other thread again for
clar
On 7-Feb-08, at 4:17 AM, symphonick wrote:
3. If there is a CONDUCTOR who performed on all tracks, the
conductor is the Release Artist.
Isn't this just the opposite of what we're doing in RelesaseTitles:
"Foo Orchestra feat. conductor: Bar Fu" (orchestra first?)
Yes. We could have b
On 7-Feb-08, at 4:12 AM, symphonick wrote:
2008/2/7, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2. If there is a COLLABORATION between a small number of
artists who performed on all tracks, the collaboration artist is the
Release Artist. (This would be similar to our regular
CollaborationStyle)
On 07/02/2008, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please take a look at
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistsStyleProposal
>
> I have attempted to take the existing ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle and
> extend it to apply to cases where all tracks are composed by one
> artist (C
> 3. If there is a CONDUCTOR who performed on all tracks, the
> conductor is the Release Artist.
Isn't this just the opposite of what we're doing in RelesaseTitles:
"Foo Orchestra feat. conductor: Bar Fu" (orchestra first?)
--
/symphonick
__
2008/2/7, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. If there is a SOLO PERFORMER who performed an instrument/
> voice on all tracks, the solo performer is the Release Artist.
Yes.
> 2. If there is a COLLABORATION between a small number of
> artists who performed on all tracks, th
21 matches
Mail list logo