I've been in contact with Ethan, an individual who runs Bandcamp (1 of 6 on
staff, apparently), and he's starting to talk technical details, so it sounds
like they're willing to provide permission to be used as a CoverArt source.
I've written up the initial details of the proposal in
On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
What you're proposing is not clear at all.
Judging from this mail and the RFC title, I think what you want is
adding BandCamp to the white-list of
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 16:09 +0100, Aurélien Mino wrote:
On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
What you're proposing is not clear at all.
Judging from this mail and the RFC title,
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 16:09 +0100, Aurélien Mino wrote:
On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
What
Jason wrote:
I've been in contact with Ethan, an individual who runs Bandcamp (1 of 6 on
staff, apparently), and he's starting to talk technical details, so it sounds
like they're willing to provide permission to be used as a CoverArt source.
I don't know what you've said so far, but it
Hi,
having Bandcamp at least as one of our supported cover art sites is a very good
idea. +2 on that.
However, many releases there are CC licensed. If we use a dedicated AR to link
to the download URL we'd loose the CC type information which we would have with
the CC AR.
That's why, if a new
I've not heard of the site before, but have no objections to the AR itself.
However, as has already been mentioned by others, there's problems here
which would block my being able to support the RFC in its current state.
You seem to be combining a CC license AR, a cover art AR, a can be
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 17:42 -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
You seem to be combining a CC license AR, a cover art AR, a can be
purchased for mailorder/download, and a normal has a page at specific
site AR.
The CC license AR is a bit specialized; CC is not just an attribute
that can be
First off, let me apologize for any bizarre formatting that takes place.
I've been using Sparrow (Desktop Mail App) lately, and it seems to have some
kinks to work out still, so I switched to the web interface mid stride. I
don't even want to know why the mailman archives page shows my first post
Agreed on the CC AR point. And again, that's what this proposal has become.
Bandcamp offers all of the listed services to users. Media, streaming,
purchase/downloading, and even physical goods sales. That's the chief reason
why this should be a dedicated Artist X has a bandcamp page at
10 matches
Mail list logo
