Re: [mb-style] Merging Eurovision Song Contest: Baku 2012 (again)

2012-05-29 Thread Andii Hughes
On 28 May 2012 22:47, Per Starbäck per.starb...@gmail.com wrote: Surely it's good to store that in MBz, but not to make it unmanageable and less useful for any other purpose until there is a good way to store this. I would not say it makes it unmangeable and less useful.  How do you think

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-114: Soundtrack style

2012-05-29 Thread Andii Hughes
On 27 May 2012 23:55, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote: On 5/27/2012 5:31 PM, Andii Hughes wrote: Oh yeah you're right.  My bad. Sorry. My bigger concern is with the second point that hasn't been addressed: Use a comma between multiple artists..  Won't this lead to X, Y, Z instead of

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC-MAMS. RG Type options : [MINI] ALBUM / [MAXI] SINGLE

2012-05-29 Thread lixobix
refresh_daemon wrote What about instances where artists/labels actually use both terms interchangeably? This is very common in Korea (and also Japan, from what I've seen). Do we just go with what's written on the cover if the artists and labels use both terms interchangeably in

Re: [mb-style] Merging Eurovision Song Contest: Baku 2012 (again)

2012-05-29 Thread Wieland Hoffmann
Hallo Andii Hughes: On 28 May 2012 21:33, Per Starbäck per.starb...@gmail.com wrote: Says you. Whereas destroying the usability of MBz because of that principle is simply not acceptable to me. The current entry for that release group is simply a lot less useful. If your principle was

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC-MAMS. RG Type options : [MINI] ALBUM / [MAXI] SINGLE

2012-05-29 Thread Per Øyvind Øygard
On 28 May 2012 07:43, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote: Hello, On 24/05/12 13:26, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:   The Wikipedia page[1] has a fairly good history, with some notable examples. While they're not used much in the western world anymore, they're still common in Japan, [2] and [3] are