On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
>> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see good
>> enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from other
>> scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
>
>
> What's wrong with
>
> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see good
> enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from other
> scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
What's wrong with adding more specific classical genres? I would love in
the futur
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 10:47 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
>> On 27 June 2012 17:09, practik wrote:
>>>
>>> Per Øyvind Øygard wrote
So add Art song and [non-classical], and reset all Song works to
nothing.
>>>
>>> This seems like a w
On 27.6.2012 20:05, Alex Mauer wrote:
>> More detailed and accurate naming of types helps identifying
>> and finding the right work.
> That’s why we have disambiguation comments.
Why should we need to use disambiguations when the same information
could be included in a work type? Searches based
On 06/26/2012 09:41 PM, ListMyCDs.com wrote:
> With a generic type I would need to use the same type for "Jurassic
> Park" musical, film and video game. There's many cases where we got TV
> shows, movies, Broadway shows and video games sharing the same name.
> Same composer might have composed d
On 06/27/2012 10:31 AM, ListMyCDs.com wrote:
>>> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see
>>> good enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from
>>> other scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
>
> On 27.6.2012 17:24, Alex Mauer
On 06/27/2012 10:47 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 17:09, practik wrote:
>>
>> Per Øyvind Øygard wrote
>>>
>>> So add Art song and [non-classical], and reset all Song works to
>>> nothing.
>>>
>>
>> This seems like a way forward, though I don't love [non-classical] because
>> it in
On 27.6.2012 3:46, SwissChris wrote:
> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see
> good enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from
> other scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
Need to add one more reason I forgot to mention
On 27 June 2012 17:09, practik wrote:
>
> Per Øyvind Øygard wrote
>>
>> So add Art song and [non-classical], and reset all Song works to
>> nothing.
>>
>
> This seems like a way forward, though I don't love [non-classical] because
> it injects a genre judgment that's not always so easy to make --
>> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see
>> good enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from
>> other scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
On 27.6.2012 17:24, Alex Mauer wrote:
> +1 to this.
Why you feel it's better to h
swisschris wrote
>
> Maybe adding (language-specific) genre "chanson", "Lied" "canzone" (and
> corresponding
> terms in other languages, each defined differently) could be a solution?
>
Well, that would certainly make life more interesting for the translators
who are working on internationaliza
On 6/26/2012 7:46 PM, SwissChris wrote:
> I would object to adding these (sub-)types of sonata and I can't see
> good enough reasons so far why we would need "film score" separate from
> other scores and why the generic "score" would not be sufficient.
+1 to this.
___
On 27 June 2012 11:46, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
>> On 27 June 2012 01:13, SwissChris wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, practik wrote:
jesus2099 wrote
>
>
> practik wrote
>>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 01:13, SwissChris wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, practik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> jesus2099 wrote
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > practik wrote
>>> >>
>>> >> As Nicolás has pointed out on this mailing list and on Jira, t
It's the 27th, so this proposal has passed.
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: RFV-123: Add tray to the cover art types
Datum: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:51:35 +0200
Van: Maurits Meulenbelt
Aan: MusicBrainz style discussion
If passed, this
On 27 June 2012 01:13, SwissChris wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, practik wrote:
>>
>>
>> jesus2099 wrote
>> >
>> >
>> > practik wrote
>> >>
>> >> As Nicolás has pointed out on this mailing list and on Jira, the
>> >> English
>> >> word "song" can be used for music without vocals:
16 matches
Mail list logo
