Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-280
Wiki:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Personal_label_relationship_type
A lot of artists have personal labels that handle the rights to their works.
Some even have their own release labels (e.g. Michael Jackson and MJJ Musi
On 5 Jan 2014 14:56, "Maurits" wrote:
>
> Oh ok. I got the impression from the original Jira ticket that this
> should be discussed somewhere, and I thought that would be here. Should
> I take this somewhere else or just add my thought s to the Jira ticket
> and forget about it for now?
Discussio
Oh ok. I got the impression from the original Jira ticket that this
should be discussed somewhere, and I thought that would be here. Should
I take this somewhere else or just add my thought s to the Jira ticket
and forget about it for now?
___
MusicBr
Given this isn't a style issue, but a code-dependant schema change, I'm not
sure what the point of an RFC would be :) How to eventually use them maybe,
but that sounds like something to decide once we know how they'll be
implemented...
___
MusicBrainz-sty
Looking through the comments so far I think most people would like to
see instruments implemented as entities, though with some conditions.
Mikhel want to be able to seed the aliases from the .pot files used for
translations on Transifex. I think I agree on that one, since making an
add alias ed
They could be, though I think most people adding a Stratocaster would
know it's a model of electric guitar. They could also be implemented as
sub-types of instruments, but that would mean a gazillion of new
instruments and I'm not sure if that's worth it.
Rachel Dwight schreef op 2-1-2014 21:51
