Re: [mb-style] RFC: Missing primary types for Asian releases

2014-01-21 Thread Mihai Spinei
I wonder if I should edit the ticket and remove the maxi single for there then send a RFV for mini-albums only. Perhaps making maxis a subtype of single would be better, since non-asian artists release singles and maxis with the same name so would be bad to categorise them separately. On Saturd

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Add a "In homage to" relationship to works

2014-01-21 Thread ListMyCDs
On 20.1.2014 13:09, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > I'll be sending a new RFC thread for this in a few days, but feel free > to discuss it a bit here first (let's treat it as a pre-RFC :) ) I would be happy to see "dedication". It is common for classical composers to dedicate their works. Have

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-285: more specific artist types for classical groups

2014-01-21 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2014/1/21 symphonick > > 2014/1/21 Frederic Da Vitoria > >> 2014/1/21 symphonick >> >>> >>> One could also have the orchestras as sub-types of the general ensemble >>> types. >>> >>> >> Isn't this mixing different ontologies? Instrumental (mixed / string / >> wind / brass) and size/complexity (

Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type

2014-01-21 Thread caller#6
On 01/21/2014 09:00 AM, caller#6 wrote: On 01/21/2014 04:15 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a type? RFVing this since only one person seemed opposed

Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type

2014-01-21 Thread caller#6
On 01/21/2014 04:15 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a type? RFVing this since only one person seemed opposed (as opposed to a quite strongly divided

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-285: more specific artist types for classical groups

2014-01-21 Thread symphonick
2014/1/21 Frederic Da Vitoria > 2014/1/21 symphonick > >> >> One could also have the orchestras as sub-types of the general ensemble >> types. >> >> > Isn't this mixing different ontologies? Instrumental (mixed / string / > wind / brass) and size/complexity (symphony / chamber). > I suggested t

[mb-style] RFV STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type

2014-01-21 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a type? RFVing this since only one person seemed opposed (as opposed to a quite strongly divided reaction to Place of Worship). If people disagree with this on

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-285: more specific artist types for classical groups

2014-01-21 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2014/1/21 symphonick > Another issue is that "chamber ensemble" implies chamber music, which > obviously doesn't suit jazz ensembles. (Note that you have to define the > difference between a chamber ensemble and a chamber orchestra!) > > One possibility: > > *Orchestra > **Chamber orchestra > **S

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-285: more specific artist types for classical groups

2014-01-21 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, symphonick wrote: > > > > 2014/1/17 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Maurits wrote: >> >>> I agree with this on principle, but wouldn't the chamber orchestra >>> sub-types become a huge list over time? With all the possible trio's

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-285: more specific artist types for classical groups

2014-01-21 Thread symphonick
2014/1/17 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Maurits wrote: > >> I agree with this on principle, but wouldn't the chamber orchestra >> sub-types become a huge list over time? With all the possible trio's, >> quartets, quintets and whatnot for various possible instrument