Hello,
On 03/23/2014 03:38 PM, Ulrich Klauer wrote:
Rachel Dwight
We recently added the option to add additional attributes to works,
one of which was JASRAC work ID. As many of you all know, several
other collection societies have repertoires of their own and special
IDs for works. Below
+1
-
PATATE12
jesus2099
GOLD MASTER KING
FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-310-New-work-attributes-tp4663505p4663616.html
Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Staffan Vilcans lift...@interface1.netwrote:
This originated at http://musicbrainz.org/edit/26842503 where the
definition of a free download came up.
Is pay what you want (guiltware) considered free as you may pay 0?
I normally use purchase for these, but
This originated at http://musicbrainz.org/edit/26842503 where the
definition of a free download came up.
Is pay what you want (guiltware) considered free as you may pay 0?
What about free downloads that require you to go trough hoops like
registering on the site (and possibly be spammed) or
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
It's just that adding two rels (well, for bandcamp, three, with the
streaming one
which I do add) feels a bit over the top.
Perhaps we should allow multiple relationship types to be mapped to one URL?
--
View this message in context:
tommycrock wrote
On 23 Mar 2014 19:09, lixobix lt;
arjtaplin@
gt; wrote:
Add 'Demo' as secondary release group type. This would allow demos and
(non-live/broadcast) studio sessions to be categorised correctly.
Would it be useful to give a (rough) definition? I'm not sure I'd put most
tommycrock wrote
On 24 Mar 2014 18:28, lixobix lt;
arjtaplin@
gt; wrote:
The problem is, where do you draw the line? There are many types of
compilation, and deciding which would fit into which of two categories
could
be difficult. Some compilations are a mixture of released and
Den 25-03-2014 14:05, lixobix skrev:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
It's just that adding two rels (well, for bandcamp, three, with the
streaming one which I do add) feels a bit over the top.
Perhaps we should allow multiple relationship types to be mapped to one URL?
That's a grand idea!
On 25 Mar 2014 13:58, lixobix arjtap...@gmail.com wrote:
tommycrock wrote
P.S. another compilation discussion currently going on
http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?id=4839
I'm not quite clear what the problem / goal is here. That forum thread
seemed largely concerned with
Looks
On 25 Mar 2014 13:45, lixobix arjtap...@gmail.com wrote:
tommycrock wrote
Would it be useful to give a (rough) definition? I'm not sure I'd put
most
studio sessions here.
How about:
A demo is a release that contains preliminary material by an artist, with
the intention that
I want to clarify the use of compilation to include 'rarities' albums, and
get your suggestions. I also want to fix a discrepancy with the official
release group style guide.
I want to change the start of
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release_Group/Type#Compilation to :
A compilation, for the
+1
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
12 matches
Mail list logo
