Re: [mb-style] Step and half brother data. Do we really want this?

2015-02-10 Thread Ulrich Klauer
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact > on this: what is the policy on adding people that have no reasonable > place in our database (i.e. never performed in any role related to > music), but are useful as "relationship proxies"? I don't

Re: [mb-style] Step and half brother data. Do we really want this?

2015-02-10 Thread Tom Crocker
On 10 Feb 2015 21:42, "Robert Bihlmeyer" wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren: > > Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and > > "half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the > > parent/child one. > a question

Re: [mb-style] Step and half brother data. Do we really want this?

2015-02-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Hi, Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren: > Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and > "half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the > parent/child one. a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact on