as i said in the thread that missed the mailing list..
I am for the addition of adding purevolume.com AR/links to artists
(not to mention I've requested something identical a while ago but never
followed through on mb-style -
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/1478 )
tomorrow will mark one week
i like your suggestion more than alternative or whatever square peg people
are trying to pound into a round hole.
again i point out that we need to call things what they are or else we will
continue to create confusing BadTermonology which creates communication
issues in the long run.
call
yes.
go to the site and click on music.
where is livejournal.coms section regarding music?
(hint: there isn't one.)
Ilya Kasnacheev wrote:
Well, does MySpace actually deal with music (not just artists or
musicians who have accounts)? If so, how does it do that?
2006/8/11, Brian G
personally I'd rather see work on URL ARs put into the ability to link to
*music* related sites such as purevolume.com or indie911.com or mp3.com or
The Podsafe Music Network or garageband.com
I think having the MySpace AR is acceptable since MySpace is a site that
deals _a lot_ with music and
actually, LiveJournal deals with blogs, not musicians or artists or music.
it's Russian musicians that are dealing with LJ.. LJ has NOTHING to do with
music.
Ilya Kasnacheev wrote:
And LiveJournal deals _a lot_ with Russian music and artists.
--
View this message in context:
is virtual really the best name for the release type?
rather than using a word and forcing a new meaning why not call it what it
really is.. a translation.
i don't think mb needs anymore confusing BadTerminology
if there are reasons to not call it something besides virtual, i'd love to
hear them.
i'm reading http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/VirtualDuplicateRelease
if a release has a track with a pi symbol in it's title than the release
needs to be entered into MB twice? (once for the symbol, and once as a
translation that read pi)
i can sort of understand entering a new release for a
Nikki wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:48:23PM -0700, Brian G. wrote:
i'm reading http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/VirtualDuplicateRelease if a
release has a track with a pi symbol in it's title than the release needs
to be entered into MB twice? (once for the symbol, and once as a
translation
so? they're basically the same thing where one is literal and one isn't.
if they're two different things than why even lump them together under a
word that is Bad?
why not (again) call things what they are rather than forcing new meanings
to words that don't apply..
create translation and
if you didn't want discussion on your proposal (which indeed contains the
creation of virtual as a release type) than you perhaps should not have
requested comments.
measure twice, cut once
-Brian
Nikki wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:37:00PM -0700, Brian G. wrote:
so? they're
we're here.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-mb-style--RFC%3A-Transliterations-translations%2C-again%21-tf2068565s2885.html#a5735295
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style forum at Nabble.com.
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
