Are we supposed to use this when we do not recognise/know the instrument or the
instrument is not in the instrument list? Personally I think it is too vague of
an AR and this info should be kept at annotation level until further research
identifies the instrument at each situation.
Actually in
I too agree with the view that an internet only release is a worldwide
release, because... well because an internet only release IS a worldwide
release, even regardless of what a label might say or where it is located.
From: "Beth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MusicBrainz style
discussion
I agree on keeping what's on the cover. If the website had it differently
only then I'd go with the more correct version.
From: "Chris Bransden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MusicBrainz style
discussion
To: "MusicBrainz style discussion"
Subject: Re: [mb-style] missing accents on Jarre's
From: Thomas Tholén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], MusicBrainz style
discussion
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] language of descriptions for untitled tracks
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:47:31 +0200
I'm not too thrilled about the whole concept of adding p
I want to add my opinion to the discussion even though I might not be able
to fully participate because I am in a studying frenzy at the moment:
I see we are talking about Live DVDs, but we should talk about Music Video
DVDs in general. Because some live DVDs may include only a concert, some
o
