I'd stumbled upon it on the wiki, but didn't realize it had already
made it to the lists.
I like it too!
Not to piggyback on this proposal, but does the list see the merit of
these sites [1-2]? I think those would need Artist-URL links. Just
bringing this up...
[1] http://www.coversproject.com/
this [1] can not be wanted behaviour?
[1]
http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/80fe84a4-b606-3491-a170-f2ca17501493/relationships
--
azertus
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman
I have tried to find some examples to work out what is wrong and what is right.
It seems that only the current release-group-URL IMDb AR is wrong.
See a summary at
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Azertus/Potential_IMDb_Relationship_Type_Problem
Of course, this might be just a bug?
azertus
2011/5/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
disc is considered bonus. It does seem
, use
it? Perhaps a sourced page on our wiki with information on the
different jobs/roles we store could be linked to?
List, this is my first posting in a long time and also the first one
using Gmail. Let me know if I'm causing unexpected effects.
Ian (azertus
I think the original argument was that the abbreviated forms in these
two cases were much more common. That doesn't seem to be the case
though. Use Last.fm to compare traditional [1] with trad. [2]... I
see no reason not to be consistent with our no-abbreviations-rule
here! (wow, 3 negations)
2006/11/13, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:54:08 +0100, azertus wrote:
2006/11/9, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've made some small formatting edits to the Promo Only guideline
page, which I think clarifies which of it comprise the actual
guideline, and which parts
2006/11/13, Lukáš Lalinský [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
azertus wrote / napísal(a):
P.S.: I suggest you don't look at the number of users using our format
:p [3]
Off-topic, but... this is mostly caused by the fact that Last.fm now rejects
anything that starts and ends with parentheses or brackets
2006/11/9, Jason Bouwmeester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(sorry if some of this looks familiar krazykiwi ;) - best to keep
things uniform!):
I have a strong dislike for the current trend of producing such
bulky guidelines. Which user wants to read say 5 pages with more or
less the same content, but a
2006/11/9, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The guideline itself, consists of this bit:
=== Begin ===
This page describes the style to be used for DMC series releases.
Enter these releases as follows:
DMC: Series Name Title # (or Year if no number and Year is part
of the title)
The Series
2006/11/9, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've made some small formatting edits to the Promo Only guideline
page, which I think clarifies which of it comprise the actual
guideline, and which parts are just extra information.
I hope this helps allay your fears, I'd like to hear what you think
before looking good to me. This is not different.
And yes, in order to know all the styleguidelines, you have to read a
lot of stuff, and some are not completely trivial.
And I'm a native speaker, and I use the french s.g., don't I?
And ho, btw, azertus, what about speaking up? :D
I really didn't
Lukáš Lalinský schreef:
Jan van Thiel wrote:
Hi,
I hereby request IMDbRelationshipStyle[1] to be made official. The
content of this guideline is already widely applied.
If you strongly oppose it, please post a veto.
Ok, veto:
Linking to only the earliest release makes no sense if we
You sure won't get a veto from me! Please go ahead...
azertus
Nikki schreef:
This keeps coming up and I hate it. ExtraTitleInformationStyle says If the
release is a single, of course one of the tracks is going to be the album
version. I think this is completely wrong. A single does
Steve Wyles schreef:
Why are there separate AR types for this?
http://musicbrainz.org/showartist.html?artistid=60429
doesn't orchestra performed cover all orchestra types?
Steve (inhouseuk)
The different orchestra {additionally} performed relationships were
changed by Shepard (?) into
Don Redman schreef:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173
not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a
relatively straightforward add.
Well, what about
Don Redman schreef:
The link phrase sounds weirt to my (nonnative) ears: Natty Dread is
covered by Natty Dread.
Is by correct? Would it not denote the artist doing the cover?
And is there a way to make clear this is a whole album-cover in the
linkphrase?
But I do not see any general
Lukáš Lalinský schreef:
Don Redman wrote:
I do not think I understood the first one, and the second one seems
absolutely obvious to me. IIRC it was even proposed before.
I don't know, maybe it's just a problem of my English and I just don't
know what exactly chorus master is. But I think
That should've been
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=1216276framed=ycobrand=2885
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
notes.
greetings
azertus, who couldn't refrain himself anymore
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
or two I should be able to help you out a bit (your efforts
are always appreciated!)
greetings
azertus, who is trying very hard to remain a bystander for now
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http
I like it! ;)
Schika wrote:
could we add the infinity symbol - or something simular - as possible
value for track durations?
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
