Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread symphonick
2013/3/5 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com 2013/3/5 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: The first part of a Classical Works guideline. http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-195

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread symphonick
2013/3/7 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com 48hrs no vetos; this proposal is accepted. I noticed that apparently http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific_types_of_releases/Opera is an official guideline, but it's outdated and it also conflicts with the new works guideline (maybe not in theory;

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread SwissChris
-1 I can't see how a description on how to format '''tracks''' would conflict with the new guideline on '''works'''. I think these (even if partly outdated) CSG guidelines should be maintained at least until we have new, better guidelines for classical/opera at release and track level. It's still

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:51 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/7 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com 48hrs no vetos; this proposal is accepted. I noticed that apparently http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific_types_of_releases/Opera is an official guideline, but it's

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread symphonick
2013/3/7 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:51 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed that apparently http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific_types_of_releases/Opera is an official guideline, but it's outdated and it also conflicts with

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-07 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/3/7 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com 2013/3/7 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com 48hrs no vetos; this proposal is accepted. I noticed that apparently http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific_types_of_releases/Opera is an official guideline, but it's outdated and it also conflicts with

[mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-05 Thread symphonick
The first part of a Classical Works guideline. http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-195 http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Symphonick/CSG_Works This RFV will expire Thursday, March 7th /symphonick ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-05 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: The first part of a Classical Works guideline. http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-195 http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Symphonick/CSG_Works This RFV will expire Thursday, March 7th One doubt I just saw. Only

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-05 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/3/5 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: The first part of a Classical Works guideline. http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-195 http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Symphonick/CSG_Works This RFV

Re: [mb-style] RFV: CSG for Works, part I

2013-03-05 Thread symphonick
2013/3/5 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote: The first part of a Classical Works guideline. http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-195 http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Symphonick/CSG_Works This RFV