"Not sure what the state of affairs is here. Should this be going back
to RFC? There was a lot of support in the RFV, but some objections too."
That doesn't seem like it would be reasonable - it's going to be vetoed
with the exact same reasoning.
The proposal process says "if the changes would en
Staffan Vilcans wrote
> 30 januari 2014, drsaunde <
> drsaunde@
> > skrev:
>> What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a
> different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same
> thing?
>>
>>
>
> I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while
30 januari 2014, drsaunde skrev:
> What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a
different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same
thing?
>
>
I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is
somewhere between EP and album length
30 januari 2014, drsaunde skrev:What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with adifferent name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the samething?I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is somewhere between EP and album length (usually
drsaunde wrote
> What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a
> different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same
> thing?
>
> Albums are sometimes called LP's. Should the fact that we have a category
> "Album" block us from adding a new category "LP"
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
> That's why, given that our definition is circular ("it's an EP if it's an
> EP") I can't see how it can be used to block mini-album. Saying "Usually
> it
> should only be assumed that a release is a mini-album if the artist/label
> defines it as such" seems perfect
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:17 AM, drsaunde wrote:
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
> >> You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP:
> >>
> >> http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120
> >>
> >> And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album:
> >>
> >> http://musicbrainz.org/relea
drsaunde wrote
> And what about those that are the same release but called Mini-Album in
> Japan and EP in North America
> or
> what about releases that meet our definition or are categorized elsewhere
> as and EP or mini-album, but aren't called either on the release...what do
> we call them then?
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
>> You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP:
>>
>> http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120
>>
>> And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album:
>>
>> http://musicbrainz.org/release/d38d37ed-7da8-3105-bc4f-2e7661667126
>>
>> The only difference i
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:41 PM, lixobix wrote:
> drsaunde wrote
> >
> > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
> >> Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically
> said
> >> he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
> >> and see if he clarifies it
drsaunde wrote
>
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
>> Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
>> he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
>> and see if he clarifies it :)
> Based on the examples provided and the proposal, I cannot f
On 01/27/2014 07:39 PM, drsaunde wrote:
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
>> Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
>> he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
>> and see if he clarifies it :)
>
> Don't proposals require at least a
On 27 Jan 2014 20:39, "drsaunde" wrote:
>
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
> > Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically
said
> > he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
> > and see if he clarifies it :)
>
> Don't proposals require at le
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
> Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
> he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
> and see if he clarifies it :)
Don't proposals require at least a +1 from someone other than the proposer?
In thi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
> I guess since the vote tally is two positive and two negative, this is in
> limbo/not passed?
>
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bi
I guess since the vote tally is two positive and two negative, this is in
limbo/not passed?
Sorry, I’m new at making feature requests to MB...
On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 7:49, Mihai Spinei wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^
>
> http:/
Hi,
Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album
On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 4:39, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote:
> > I'd put something like this in the gu
Hi,
On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote:
> I'd put something like this in the guidelines:
>
> "A Mini-Album (or Mini-LP) is a release that is in between EP and Album in
> terms of number of tracks and length. The number of tracks is around 7-9,
> and the length varies from around 20-35 mins. The
drsaunde wrote
>
> Mihai Spinei wrote
>> Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
>> now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
>>
>> ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282
>> wiki:
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-
Mihai Spinei wrote
> Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
> now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
>
> ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282
> wiki:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album
>
> Expires of 2014
This is an RFV, so that may qualify as a veto.
On Jan 23, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/23/2014 02:05 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
>> On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
Got a couple of +1s for mini-albu
Hello,
On 01/23/2014 02:05 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
>>> Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
>>> now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
>>
>> I'm not convinced
On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
>> Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
>> now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
>
> I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant
> enoug
+1
-
PATATE12
jesus2099
GOLD MASTER KING
FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661640.html
Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
> > Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
> > now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
>
> I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is signi
Hello,
On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
> Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
> now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant
enough to warrant this distinction in the database, so -1
Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now,
will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282
wiki: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album
Expires of 2014-01-25
27 matches
Mail list logo
