Oleg "Rowaa[SR13]" V. Volkov wrote:
Maybe the style guideline itself could be even stripped down to
something describing: "Use latin script. Use a sortname that orders
the artist to a position where you'd expect it in record stores and
libraries."
Speaking of "where you'd expect it", non-engli
Greetings.
Monday, February 13, 2006, 7:34:49 PM Bjorn. wrote:
> Maybe the style guideline itself could be even stripped down to
> something describing: "Use latin script. Use a sortname that orders
> the artist to a position where you'd expect it in record stores and
> libraries."
Speaking of "w
On 2/13/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:46:18 +0100, Jan van Thiel wrote:
> > I think SortNameStyle ( http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SortNameStyle ) is
> > good enough to (finally) become official. Mostly current practice is
> > written down, so it doesn't have any i
Simon Tucker wrote:
Additionally, how do you deal with numbers - there are problems of sorting
them numerically or by their words. e.g. I would file "The 411" *after* "808
State" on my shelves.
I wouldn't. Or maybe I'm missing your point?
Paula (spacefish)
_
> I think SortNameStyle ( http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SortNameStyle ) is
> good enough to (finally) become official. Mostly current practice is
> written down, so it doesn't have any impact on other guidelines, the
> database or customers.
>
> Are there any objections to the current version on the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:46:18 +0100, Jan van Thiel wrote:
Hi,
I think SortNameStyle ( http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SortNameStyle ) is
good enough to (finally) become official. Mostly current practice is
written down, so it doesn't have any impact on other guidelines, the
database or customers.
A
Hi,
I think SortNameStyle ( http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SortNameStyle ) is
good enough to (finally) become official. Mostly current practice is
written down, so it doesn't have any impact on other guidelines, the
database or customers.
Are there any objections to the current version on the wiki?
